From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39245) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1er16B-0002l7-6W for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 28 Feb 2018 07:44:44 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1er168-0006aw-3Q for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 28 Feb 2018 07:44:43 -0500 Received: from mx3-rdu2.redhat.com ([66.187.233.73]:60532 helo=mx1.redhat.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1er167-0006aL-Ul for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 28 Feb 2018 07:44:40 -0500 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3306F402290A for ; Wed, 28 Feb 2018 12:44:39 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2018 20:44:24 +0800 From: Peter Xu Message-ID: <20180228124424.GG27381@xz-mi> References: <20180228050633.7410-1-peterx@redhat.com> <20180228050633.7410-4-peterx@redhat.com> <20180228090845.GB31550@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180228090845.GB31550@redhat.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 03/14] qio: introduce qio_channel_add_watch_full() List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Daniel =?utf-8?B?UC4gQmVycmFuZ8Op?= Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Paolo Bonzini , Juan Quintela , Markus Armbruster , =?utf-8?Q?Marc-Andr=C3=A9?= Lureau , Stefan Hajnoczi , "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 09:08:45AM +0000, Daniel P. Berrang=C3=A9 wrote: > On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 01:06:22PM +0800, Peter Xu wrote: > > It's a more powerful version of qio_channel_add_watch(), which suppor= ts > > non-default gcontext. It's stripped from the old one, then we have > > g_source_get_id() to fetch the tag ID to keep the old interface. > >=20 > > Note that the new API will return a gsource, meanwhile keep a referen= ce > > of it so that callers need to unref them explicitly. >=20 > I don't really like this. Having qio_channel_add_watch and > qio_channel_add_watch_full with differing return values is > really very surprising. They should be functionally identical, > except for the extra context arg. Yeah it's not nice, but I do need the GSource and the tag ID does not help in the series. An alternative would be that I modify qio_channel_add_watch() to return GSource too. Is there an third choice that you could suggest? Thanks, --=20 Peter Xu