Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] block: Fix NULL dereference on empty drive error

[Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>]

Am 05.03.2018 um 17:10 hat Eric Blake geschrieben:
> On 03/05/2018 09:05 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > blk_error_action() sends a BLOCK_IO_ERROR QMP event which includes the
> > node name of its root node. If the BlockBackend represents an empty
> > drive, there is no root node, so we should not try to access its node
> > name. Make the field optional in the event and include it only when
> > the BlockBackend isn't empty.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > 
> > Stefan, this is needed for your patch that reverts the workaround in the
> > IDE flush code. Without it, make check seems to succeed, but if you look
> > closer, qemu actually segfaults.
> > 
> > qapi/block-core.json  | 6 ++++--
> >   block/block-backend.c | 5 +++--
> >   2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/qapi/block-core.json b/qapi/block-core.json
> > index 5c5921bfb7..00475f08d4 100644
> > --- a/qapi/block-core.json
> > +++ b/qapi/block-core.json
> > @@ -3676,7 +3676,8 @@
> >   #
> >   # @node-name: node name. Note that errors may be reported for the root node
> >   #             that is directly attached to a guest device rather than for the
> > -#             node where the error occurred. (Since: 2.8)
> > +#             node where the error occurred. The node name is not present if
> > +#             the drive is empty. (Since: 2.8)
> 
> Making an output field change from always present to sometimes absent
> might break older clients that expected to be able to parse the field
> unconditionally.  Would it be better to keep the 'node-name' field
> mandatory in the output but make it an empty string?

I considered that, but how likely is it that a client can handle an
empty string instead of a valid node name, but can't handle an absent
field? I assume that such clients would probably break either way. And
in that case I preferred to use the cleaner design.

> Then again, since the field was not present prior to 2.8, but the event
> itself is older, we can argue that clients of older qemu have to be prepared
> for the field to not be present.  So I think I can live with this change
> as-is.

Right, that too. If libvirt can deal with it (and I suppose it can
because it doesn't really use node names yet), we should be okay.
> 
> >   #
> >   # @operation: I/O operation
> >   #
> > @@ -3707,7 +3708,8 @@
> >   #
> >   ##
> >   { 'event': 'BLOCK_IO_ERROR',
> > -  'data': { 'device': 'str', 'node-name': 'str', 'operation': 'IoOperationType',
> > +  'data': { 'device': 'str', '*node-name': 'str',
> > +            'operation': 'IoOperationType',
> >               'action': 'BlockErrorAction', '*nospace': 'bool',
> >               'reason': 'str' } }
> 
> Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>

Thanks.

Kevin