qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
To: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	qemu-s390x@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [qemu-s390x] [PATCH v4 3/3] s390x/sclp: extend SCLP event masks to 64 bits
Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2018 10:27:52 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180306102752.168548c7.cohuck@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d16953b5-e47d-937e-dd61-f0acf302d949@de.ibm.com>

On Tue, 6 Mar 2018 09:23:23 +0100
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> wrote:

> On 03/05/2018 04:27 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > On Fri, 2 Mar 2018 10:44:46 +0100
> > Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> wrote:
> >   
> >> On 02/23/2018 06:42 PM, Claudio Imbrenda wrote:  
> >>> Extend the SCLP event masks to 64 bits.
> >>>
> >>> Notice that using any of the new bits results in a state that cannot be
> >>> migrated to an older version.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> >>> ---
> >>>  hw/s390x/event-facility.c         | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> >>>  include/hw/s390x/event-facility.h |  2 +-
> >>>  2 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/hw/s390x/event-facility.c b/hw/s390x/event-facility.c
> >>> index e04ed9f..c3e39ee 100644
> >>> --- a/hw/s390x/event-facility.c
> >>> +++ b/hw/s390x/event-facility.c
> >>> @@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ struct SCLPEventFacility {
> >>>      SysBusDevice parent_obj;
> >>>      SCLPEventsBus sbus;
> >>>      /* guest's receive mask */
> >>> -    sccb_mask_t receive_mask;
> >>> +    uint32_t receive_mask_pieces[2];    
> >>
> >>
> >> Before the change, we basically use be32_to_cpu to transfer the byte field into a cpu
> >> endianess value. In the end it is actually a bitfield, but for compat we need to keep
> >> he reversal. So it will be hard to get this fixed without some kind of ugliness.  
> > 
> > Could we also use a compat mask callback/handler for older machines and
> > switch to 64 bit handlers for the default case? Probably would be even
> > more ugly, though.  
> 
> Claudio had a version with a pre/post/load/save handler. Claudio can you repost this
> version so that we can have a look what is "less ugly"?
> 

Would that other version be independent of the first two patches (i.e.,
only replace this patch)?

I would like to apply patch 1 as it is a fix, and patch 2 seems
uncontroversial as a cleanup.

  reply	other threads:[~2018-03-06  9:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-02-23 17:42 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 0/3] s390x/sclp: 64 bit event masks Claudio Imbrenda
2018-02-23 17:42 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 1/3] s390x/sclp: proper support of larger send and receive masks Claudio Imbrenda
2018-03-02  9:09   ` [Qemu-devel] [qemu-s390x] " Christian Borntraeger
2018-03-06 15:21     ` Cornelia Huck
2018-03-06 15:29       ` Claudio Imbrenda
2018-02-23 17:42 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 2/3] s390x/sclp: clean up sclp masks Claudio Imbrenda
2018-03-02  9:18   ` [Qemu-devel] [qemu-s390x] " Christian Borntraeger
2018-03-06 15:27   ` [Qemu-devel] " Cornelia Huck
2018-02-23 17:42 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 3/3] s390x/sclp: extend SCLP event masks to 64 bits Claudio Imbrenda
2018-02-26 16:57   ` Cornelia Huck
2018-02-28 19:31     ` Christian Borntraeger
2018-03-06 14:26     ` Claudio Imbrenda
2018-03-02  9:44   ` [Qemu-devel] [qemu-s390x] " Christian Borntraeger
2018-03-05 15:27     ` Cornelia Huck
2018-03-06  8:23       ` Christian Borntraeger
2018-03-06  9:27         ` Cornelia Huck [this message]
2018-03-06 15:09           ` Claudio Imbrenda
2018-03-06 15:09         ` Claudio Imbrenda
2018-03-06 15:07       ` Claudio Imbrenda
2018-02-26 16:39 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 0/3] s390x/sclp: 64 bit event masks Cornelia Huck
2018-03-07  9:41 ` Cornelia Huck

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180306102752.168548c7.cohuck@redhat.com \
    --to=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=imbrenda@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).