From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36086) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1etl3B-00005c-Cy for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 07 Mar 2018 21:12:58 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1etl3A-0007Oo-KM for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 07 Mar 2018 21:12:57 -0500 Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2018 10:12:41 +0800 From: Fam Zheng Message-ID: <20180308021241.GM13844@lemon.usersys.redhat.com> References: <20180205202232.19254-1-mreitz@redhat.com> <73838a0c-d960-d24d-b706-a0ecbcbe7aaf@redhat.com> <20180307100424.GA7917@localhost.localdomain> <2d97780c-4a06-1b08-8211-760fc3567c2a@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2d97780c-4a06-1b08-8211-760fc3567c2a@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-block] [PATCH 0/2] block/ssh: Implement .bdrv_refresh_filename() List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: John Snow Cc: Kevin Wolf , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Richard W . M . Jones" , qemu-block@nongnu.org, Max Reitz On Wed, 03/07 12:50, John Snow wrote: > It's something I'd like to see patchew do, actually: > > "Here's a list of what's on the list that has no reviews or NACKs, and > needs some love" It's not hard to define a search condition for that: http://patchew.org/search-help http://patchew.org/search?q=project%3AQEMU+age%3A%3E1m+not%3Areviewed+not%3Areplied+not%3Amerged+is%3Atested+to%3Aqemu-block > > coupled with a 30 day "Hey, nobody looked at this" ping to the list > before it NACKs a set for being too old. If the initial landing of the patch didn't get enough attention, chances are the pings will not change much about it especially it's from a bot. A summary list sounds good, though. Fam