From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48436) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1evQt9-0007Js-1L for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 12 Mar 2018 13:05:31 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1evQt8-0005hh-85 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 12 Mar 2018 13:05:31 -0400 Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2018 01:05:19 +0800 From: Fam Zheng Message-ID: <20180312170519.GB8326@lemon.usersys.redhat.com> References: <20180312132204.23683-1-stefanha@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: add include/block/aio-wait.h List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Eric Blake Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-block@nongnu.org On Mon, 03/12 09:05, Eric Blake wrote: > On 03/12/2018 08:22 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > > The include/block/aio-wait.h header file was added by commit > > 7719f3c968c59e1bcda7e177679dc765b59e578f ("block: extract > > AIO_WAIT_WHILE() from BlockDriverState") without updating MAINTAINERS. > > A shame checkpatch.pl and/or patchew still doesn't flag this, even though > it's been proposed as a syntax check. Re checkpatch.pl vs patchew, IMO this check fits better in the former. Fam