From: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>
To: "Marc-André Lureau" <marcandre.lureau@gmail.com>
Cc: QEMU <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] tests: make docker-test-debug@fedora run sanitizers
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2018 01:41:02 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180312174102.GD8326@lemon.usersys.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJ+F1CKugGNH7kdchrpuF+GXSPMd4s2-w7bSCpH3UNHiwQGR1A@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, 03/12 18:17, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 6:11 PM, Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, 03/12 15:11, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> >> Hi Fam,
> >>
> >> It would be great if patchew could run the debug/sanitizer build.
> >> Unfortunately, except x86 target, the run is full of ASAN leaks or
> >> warnings.
> >>
> >> Do you think patchew could learn to do regression testing? By that I
> >> mean that patchew could compare a patchset output with the current
> >> master (that output should be cached for multiple tests). The output
> >> to compare here would be the errors reported by ASAN during the build.
> >> (eventually, this could be used for other metrics some day). If so,
> >> would you be willing to help me implementing it?
> >
> > The question is can we simply rely on the exit code of cmp or diff for that kind
> > of comparison? If there is any out-of-order texts, that simple diff won't work.
>
> If the tests are run sequentially, i think it should produce the same
> output when run multiple times (to be verified).
In that case the test will last for a long time. Currently patchew isn't very
good as multi-tasking. But that is one option we can explore (like we can devote
one VM for asan test).
>
> However, if there are leaks already, and the address of allocation or
> symbols change, this may produce diff on existing lines.
Maybe we can come up with a 'make docker-test-debug-filtered@fedora' or a
relatively simple 'make docker-test-debug@fedora | sed -e "..."' command that
can be fed to diff.
>
> What I would like to see is the diff of added (or removed) lines.
>
> I suppose that should be possible, I'll do some experiments.
>
> > Anything more intelligent/sensible should go as a policy, and patchew should
> > continue focus on mechanisms.
>
> hmm ok :)
Like said above, I think it's possible to postprocess the output to make it easy
to diff/cmp. By mechanism/policy I mean the place to draw a line to code
Patchew. However patchew has a database where we can write test script snippets
(as configurations) that is "the policy".
Fam
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-03-12 17:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-03-12 12:08 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] tests: make docker-test-debug@fedora run sanitizers Marc-André Lureau
2018-03-12 14:11 ` Marc-André Lureau
2018-03-12 17:11 ` Fam Zheng
2018-03-12 17:17 ` Marc-André Lureau
2018-03-12 17:41 ` Fam Zheng [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180312174102.GD8326@lemon.usersys.redhat.com \
--to=famz@redhat.com \
--cc=marcandre.lureau@gmail.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).