From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43851) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ewO75-00019V-Sg for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 15 Mar 2018 04:19:52 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ewO71-0006dT-UZ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 15 Mar 2018 04:19:51 -0400 Received: from mx3-rdu2.redhat.com ([66.187.233.73]:42406 helo=mx1.redhat.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ewO71-0006d7-Pq for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 15 Mar 2018 04:19:47 -0400 Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2018 16:19:37 +0800 From: Fam Zheng Message-ID: <20180315081937.GI2733@lemon.usersys.redhat.com> References: <20180309091535.13315-1-peterx@redhat.com> <808d1efc-2db7-01a2-23ba-3af108d9d1e7@redhat.com> <235748d9-3bc2-637b-f926-6436d11f4f61@redhat.com> <20180312044504.GF5234@xz-mi> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180312044504.GF5234@xz-mi> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v7 00/23] Migration: postcopy failure recovery List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Xu Cc: Eric Blake , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Andrea Arcangeli , Juan Quintela , Alexey Perevalov , "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" On Mon, 03/12 12:45, Peter Xu wrote: > On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 10:59:03AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote: > > On 03/09/2018 10:54 AM, Eric Blake wrote: > > > On 03/09/2018 03:15 AM, Peter Xu wrote: > > > > Based-on: <20180309090006.10018-1-peterx@redhat.com> > > > >=20 > > > > This series is based on the series: > > > >=20 > > > > =A0=A0 [PATCH v8 00/23] QMP: out-of-band (OOB) execution support > > >=20 > > > Let's spell that in a way patchew understands: > > >=20 > > > Based-on: <20180309090006.10018-1-peterx@redhat.com> > > >=20 > >=20 > > Never mind - I missed that you snuck that in on the very first line (= which > > I'm used to overlooking because it's often a 'From:' author attributi= on, > > instead of a patchew directive). I saw the patchew failure messages,= but > > didn't read them closely to see why it is failing, and merely assumed= it was > > because of the missing dependency... >=20 > Yeh, but there still seems to be something wrong elsewhere since the > series can pass compilation and docker tests on my host... >=20 > Fam, what would happen if I firstly post OOB series, then postcopy > series (which will have "based-on" on OOB series) right away? Could > Patchew just ignore the "based-on" if I post the 2nd series too fast > since Patchew may have not yet went through the first one? Could be. Git apply of the first one races with the appearance of the sec= ond one in patchew's database. Or if the emails arrive in patchew's INBOX out-of-= order, the based-on tag will not work as expected. Fam