From: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
To: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Cc: "Christian Borntraeger" <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Kevin Wolf" <kwolf@redhat.com>,
"Peter Maydell" <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
"Fam Zheng" <famz@redhat.com>,
"Markus Armbruster" <armbru@redhat.com>,
"Max Reitz" <mreitz@redhat.com>,
"Eric Auger" <eric.auger@redhat.com>,
"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Marc-André Lureau" <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>,
"John Snow" <jsnow@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.12 0/4] Turn OOB off for 2.12-rc1, revert OOB tests
Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2018 08:52:58 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180324005258.GT32362@xz-mi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <319a5fdb-496d-1100-b5ce-78bbf4781cb4@redhat.com>
On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 01:36:28PM -0500, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 03/23/2018 01:30 PM, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>
> > > Even that didn't work - 'make check' fails with either 1/4 or 4/4 applied in isolation, so I'm squashing them into a single patch.
> >
> > Yes, "qmp: introduce QMPCapability" added an assert, that was fixed by a later on patch. So
> > the original series was not bisectable. Anyway with Peters 4 patches all applied things are fine
> > for me.
>
> Weird, since I seem to recall running 'make check' on every patch in order
> in that series without seeing failures, prior to preparing the pull request
> (where I fell short was running iotests, which is what sparked this whole
> revert thread). Anyways, even if my memory is faulty and the original
> series has a broken bisection window, it's now water under the bridge; the
> focus at this point is improving the known bugs to see if we can re-enable
> OOB prior to -rc2.
I think each of the commit in original series should pass "make check"
before. But for this revert series, it can't. I'll take this into
consideration next time even reverting patches.
Regarding to the revert ordering itself: IMHO as long as we do the
first patch last (put "Revert monitor: enable IO thread for (qmp &
!mux) typed" at the end), we should be able to pass "make check" too.
So the correct order should be:
patch 2-4 (in any order, since each of them is only a test case)
patch 1
And, since at it, I just noticed that we could even keep one of the
test ("tests: qmp-test: verify command batching"), but anyway it won't
hurt if we revert that too now.
--
Peter Xu
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-03-24 0:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-03-23 14:08 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.12 0/4] Turn OOB off for 2.12-rc1, revert OOB tests Peter Xu
2018-03-23 14:08 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.12 1/4] Revert "monitor: enable IO thread for (qmp & !mux) typed" Peter Xu
2018-03-23 15:49 ` Eric Blake
2018-03-24 1:01 ` Peter Xu
2018-03-23 14:08 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.12 2/4] Revert "tests: qmp-test: add oob test" Peter Xu
2018-03-23 14:08 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.12 3/4] Revert "tests: qmp-test: verify command batching" Peter Xu
2018-03-23 14:08 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.12 4/4] tests: partly revert "qmp: introduce QMPCapability" Peter Xu
2018-03-23 14:15 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.12 0/4] Turn OOB off for 2.12-rc1, revert OOB tests Peter Xu
2018-03-23 14:33 ` Christian Borntraeger
2018-03-23 15:42 ` Eric Blake
2018-03-23 15:53 ` Eric Blake
2018-03-23 17:17 ` Eric Blake
2018-03-23 18:30 ` Christian Borntraeger
2018-03-23 18:36 ` Eric Blake
2018-03-24 0:52 ` Peter Xu [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180324005258.GT32362@xz-mi \
--to=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
--cc=famz@redhat.com \
--cc=jsnow@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=marcandre.lureau@redhat.com \
--cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).