qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
To: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-block@nongnu.org,
	Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>,
	QingFeng Hao <haoqf@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qemu-iotests: update 185 output
Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2018 16:13:36 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180403141336.GE11070@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180403140314.8795-1-stefanha@redhat.com>

Am 03.04.2018 um 16:03 hat Stefan Hajnoczi geschrieben:
> Commit 4486e89c219c0d1b9bd8dfa0b1dd5b0d51ff2268 ("vl: introduce
> vm_shutdown()") added a bdrv_drain_all() call.  As a side-effect of the
> drain operation the block job iterates one more time than before.  The
> 185 output no longer matches and the test is failing now.
> 
> It may be possible to avoid the superfluous block job iteration, but
> that type of patch is not suitable late in the QEMU 2.12 release cycle.
> 
> This patch simply updates the 185 output file.  The new behavior is
> correct, just not optimal, so make the test pass again.
> 
> Fixes: 4486e89c219c0d1b9bd8dfa0b1dd5b0d51ff2268 ("vl: introduce vm_shutdown()")
> Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
> Cc: QingFeng Hao <haoqf@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>

Do you want to update the comment in the 185 test case code that
explains which values we expect?

Kevin

  reply	other threads:[~2018-04-03 14:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-04-03 14:03 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qemu-iotests: update 185 output Stefan Hajnoczi
2018-04-03 14:13 ` Kevin Wolf [this message]
2018-04-04 15:02   ` [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-block] " Stefan Hajnoczi
2018-04-04  6:59 ` [Qemu-devel] " QingFeng Hao
2018-04-04 15:02   ` [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-block] " Stefan Hajnoczi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180403141336.GE11070@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=haoqf@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).