From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:32806) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f3q8p-0007na-BG for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 04 Apr 2018 17:40:28 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f3q8m-0006QX-3o for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 04 Apr 2018 17:40:27 -0400 Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.29]:56945) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f3q8l-0006QB-OE for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 04 Apr 2018 17:40:23 -0400 Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2018 17:39:38 -0400 From: "Emilio G. Cota" Message-ID: <20180404213938.GA28643@flamenco> References: <20180207225540.31698-1-richard.henderson@linaro.org> <20180207225540.31698-17-richard.henderson@linaro.org> <20180404164908.GA7582@flamenco> <878ta2de2z.fsf@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <878ta2de2z.fsf@linaro.org> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 16/20] target/arm: Use vector infrastructure for aa64 compares List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Alex =?iso-8859-1?Q?Benn=E9e?= Cc: Richard Henderson , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, peter.maydell@linaro.org On Wed, Apr 04, 2018 at 19:24:52 +0100, Alex Bennée wrote: > > Emilio G. Cota writes: > > > On Wed, Feb 07, 2018 at 14:55:36 -0800, Richard Henderson wrote: > >> Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée > >> Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell > >> Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson > > > > Just bisected a segfault for aarch64 nbench on a PowerPC host > > to this commit (79d61de6bdc398). I've also tested on x86_64 and > > aarch64 hosts, and these do not seem to be affected. > > I wonder about other hosts without TCG_vec backend support (powerpc is > one)? I suspect it must be the fall-back for the vector expanders is > wrong. I just tried on two additional machines: - Reproduced on a different PowerPC host with different endianness (gcc110, which is power7 and therefore big endian) - Could not reproduce on a mips64 host (gcc23) So it might be a Power-only thing. Thanks, Emilio