From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
To: Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org>
Cc: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>,
qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, clg@kaod.org,
bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.13 13/13] target/ppc: Fold slb_nr into PPCHash64Options
Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2018 15:27:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180405152734.2e984bc5.cohuck@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180405151255.63da677e@bahia.lan>
On Thu, 5 Apr 2018 15:12:55 +0200
Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Apr 2018 12:14:37 +1000
> David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> wrote:
> > @@ -4000,7 +4000,12 @@ DEFINE_SPAPR_MACHINE(2_13, "2.13", true);
> > * pseries-2.12
> > */
> > #define SPAPR_COMPAT_2_12 \
> > - HW_COMPAT_2_12
>
> This hunk doesn't apply on master, nor on your ppc-for-2.13 branch...
>
> It looks like a patch to introduce the 2.13 machine type is missing.
>
> FWIW, Connie has already queued a patch to do so for s390x, that also
> introduces HW_COMPAT_2_12.
>
> https://github.com/cohuck/qemu/commit/b54cde7350b6681b4349b904e0f9a8a8d58c0951
>
> Maybe the HW_COMPAT_ macros should be added in a standalone patch ?
>
> Cc'ing Connie for insights.
>
> > + HW_COMPAT_2_12 \
> > + { \
> > + .driver = TYPE_POWERPC_CPU, \
> > + .property = "pre-2.13-migration", \
> > + .value = "on", \
I think the usual procedure is
- every arch that uses compat machines queues a patch that creates the
new compat machine(s) and adds an empty HW_COMPAT_<version>
- whoever has their queue pulled first wins wrt hw_compat
So, I'm happy with anyone adding the empty HW_COMPAT_2_12 -- it needn't
be me :)
[We could also introduce the 2.13 machines for all architectures in one
sweep, but I think that would be generating needless churn for arch
maintainers.]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-05 13:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-05 2:14 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.13 00/13] target/ppc: Assorted cpu cleanups (esp. hash64 MMU) David Gibson
2018-04-05 2:14 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.13 01/13] target/ppc: Standardize instance_init and realize function names David Gibson
2018-04-05 2:14 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.13 02/13] target/ppc: Simplify cpu valid check in ppc_cpu_realize David Gibson
2018-04-05 2:14 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.13 03/13] target/ppc: Pass cpu instead of env to ppc_create_page_sizes_prop() David Gibson
2018-04-05 2:14 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.13 04/13] target/ppc: Avoid taking "env" parameter to mmu-hash64 functions David Gibson
2018-04-05 2:14 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.13 05/13] target/ppc: Remove fallback 64k pagesize information David Gibson
2018-04-05 2:14 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.13 06/13] target/ppc: Move page size setup to helper function David Gibson
2018-04-05 2:14 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.13 07/13] target/ppc: Split page size information into a separate allocation David Gibson
2018-04-05 2:14 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.13 08/13] target/ppc: Make hash64_opts field mandatory for 64-bit hash MMUs David Gibson
2018-04-05 2:14 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.13 09/13] target/ppc: Move 1T segment and AMR options to PPCHash64Options David Gibson
2018-04-05 12:06 ` Greg Kurz
2018-04-06 4:58 ` David Gibson
2018-04-05 2:14 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.13 10/13] target/ppc: Fold ci_large_pages flag into PPCHash64Options David Gibson
2018-04-05 2:14 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.13 11/13] target/ppc: Remove unnecessary POWERPC_MMU_V3 flag from mmu_model David Gibson
2018-04-05 2:14 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.13 12/13] target/ppc: Get rid of POWERPC_MMU_VER() macros David Gibson
2018-04-05 2:14 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.13 13/13] target/ppc: Fold slb_nr into PPCHash64Options David Gibson
2018-04-05 13:12 ` Greg Kurz
2018-04-05 13:27 ` Cornelia Huck [this message]
2018-04-06 1:09 ` David Gibson
2018-04-06 0:49 ` David Gibson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180405152734.2e984bc5.cohuck@redhat.com \
--to=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=clg@kaod.org \
--cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=groug@kaod.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-ppc@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).