From: Aaron Lindsay <alindsay@codeaurora.org>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Cc: qemu-arm <qemu-arm@nongnu.org>,
Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@xilinx.com>,
Wei Huang <wei@redhat.com>,
Peter Crosthwaite <crosthwaite.peter@gmail.com>,
QEMU Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
Michael Spradling <mspradli@codeaurora.org>,
Digant Desai <digantd@codeaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 12/22] target/arm: Filter cycle counter based on PMCCFILTR_EL0
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2018 13:36:25 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180412173625.GK24561@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFEAcA_UP-DgPZPL8-sMAs9TFHiUrfya8LAxAnO2U_WJAMH6yg@mail.gmail.com>
On Apr 12 18:15, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 16 March 2018 at 20:31, Aaron Lindsay <alindsay@codeaurora.org> wrote:
> > The pmu_counter_filtered and pmu_op_start/finish functions are generic
> > (as opposed to PMCCNTR-specific) to allow for the implementation of
> > other events.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Aaron Lindsay <alindsay@codeaurora.org>
> > ---
> > target/arm/cpu.c | 3 ++
> > target/arm/cpu.h | 37 +++++++++++++++++++----
> > target/arm/helper.c | 87 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> > 3 files changed, 116 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/target/arm/cpu.c b/target/arm/cpu.c
> > index a2cb21e..b0d032c 100644
> > --- a/target/arm/cpu.c
> > +++ b/target/arm/cpu.c
> > @@ -887,6 +887,9 @@ static void arm_cpu_realizefn(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
> > if (!cpu->has_pmu) {
> > unset_feature(env, ARM_FEATURE_PMU);
> > cpu->id_aa64dfr0 &= ~0xf00;
> > + } else {
> > + arm_register_pre_el_change_hook(cpu, &pmu_pre_el_change, 0);
> > + arm_register_el_change_hook(cpu, &pmu_post_el_change, 0);
>
> You probably don't want to do this if we're using KVM, as there
> are some code paths where we call do_interrupt() when using KVM
> which will trigger the hooks and likely do unexpected things.
> (For instance kvm_arm_handle_debug() does this to set the guest
> up to take debug exceptions.)
Okay, I'll surround this with `if (!kvm_enabled())` for the next pass.
>
> > }
> >
> > if (!arm_feature(env, ARM_FEATURE_EL2)) {
> > diff --git a/target/arm/cpu.h b/target/arm/cpu.h
> > index b0ef727..9c3b5ef 100644
> > --- a/target/arm/cpu.h
> > +++ b/target/arm/cpu.h
> > @@ -458,6 +458,11 @@ typedef struct CPUARMState {
> > * was reset. Otherwise it stores the counter value
> > */
> > uint64_t c15_ccnt;
> > + /* ccnt_cached_cycles is used to hold the last cycle count when
> > + * c15_ccnt holds the guest-visible count instead of the delta during
> > + * PMU operations which require this.
> > + */
> > + uint64_t ccnt_cached_cycles;
>
> Can this ever hold valid state at a point when we need to do VM
> migration, or is it purely temporary ?
I believe that as of this version of the patch it is temporary and will
not need to be migrated. However, I believe it's going to be necessary
to have two variables to represent the state of each counter in order to
implement interrupt on overflow.
>
> > uint64_t pmccfiltr_el0; /* Performance Monitor Filter Register */
> > uint64_t vpidr_el2; /* Virtualization Processor ID Register */
> > uint64_t vmpidr_el2; /* Virtualization Multiprocessor ID Register */
> > @@ -896,15 +901,35 @@ int cpu_arm_signal_handler(int host_signum, void *pinfo,
> > void *puc);
> >
> > /**
> > - * pmccntr_sync
> > + * pmccntr_op_start/finish
>
> Shouldn't this doc change and prototype change have gone with the earlier
> patch that changed the implementation?
Hmmm, yes. Seems like I got pmccntr_op_start and pmu_op_start confused
when staging this.
> > * @env: CPUARMState
> > *
> > - * Synchronises the counter in the PMCCNTR. This must always be called twice,
> > - * once before any action that might affect the timer and again afterwards.
> > - * The function is used to swap the state of the register if required.
> > - * This only happens when not in user mode (!CONFIG_USER_ONLY)
> > + * Convert the counter in the PMCCNTR between its delta form (the typical mode
> > + * when it's enabled) and the guest-visible value. These two calls must always
> > + * surround any action which might affect the counter, and the return value
> > + * from pmccntr_op_start must be supplied as the second argument to
> > + * pmccntr_op_finish.
> > + */
> > +uint64_t pmccntr_op_start(CPUARMState *env);
> > +void pmccntr_op_finish(CPUARMState *env, uint64_t prev_cycles);
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * pmu_op_start/finish
> > + * @env: CPUARMState
> > + *
> > + * Convert all PMU counters between their delta form (the typical mode when
> > + * they are enabled) and the guest-visible values. These two calls must
> > + * surround any action which might affect the counters, and the return value
> > + * from pmu_op_start must be supplied as the second argument to pmu_op_finish.
> > + */
> > +uint64_t pmu_op_start(CPUARMState *env);
> > +void pmu_op_finish(CPUARMState *env, uint64_t prev_cycles);
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * Functions to register as EL change hooks for PMU mode filtering
> > */
> > -void pmccntr_sync(CPUARMState *env);
> > +void pmu_pre_el_change(ARMCPU *cpu, void *ignored);
> > +void pmu_post_el_change(ARMCPU *cpu, void *ignored);
> >
> > /* SCTLR bit meanings. Several bits have been reused in newer
> > * versions of the architecture; in that case we define constants
> > diff --git a/target/arm/helper.c b/target/arm/helper.c
> > index 0102357..95b09d6 100644
> > --- a/target/arm/helper.c
> > +++ b/target/arm/helper.c
> > @@ -908,6 +908,15 @@ static const ARMCPRegInfo v6_cp_reginfo[] = {
> > #define PMCRC 0x4
> > #define PMCRE 0x1
> >
> > +#define PMXEVTYPER_P 0x80000000
> > +#define PMXEVTYPER_U 0x40000000
> > +#define PMXEVTYPER_NSK 0x20000000
> > +#define PMXEVTYPER_NSU 0x10000000
> > +#define PMXEVTYPER_NSH 0x08000000
> > +#define PMXEVTYPER_M 0x04000000
> > +#define PMXEVTYPER_MT 0x02000000
> > +#define PMXEVTYPER_EVTCOUNT 0x000003ff
> > +
> > #define PMU_NUM_COUNTERS(env) ((env->cp15.c9_pmcr & PMCRN_MASK) >> PMCRN_SHIFT)
> > /* Bits allowed to be set/cleared for PMCNTEN* and PMINTEN* */
> > #define PMU_COUNTER_MASK(env) ((1 << 31) | ((1 << PMU_NUM_COUNTERS(env)) - 1))
> > @@ -998,7 +1007,7 @@ static CPAccessResult pmreg_access_ccntr(CPUARMState *env,
> >
> > static inline bool arm_ccnt_enabled(CPUARMState *env)
> > {
> > - /* This does not support checking PMCCFILTR_EL0 register */
> > + /* Does not check PMCCFILTR_EL0, which is handled by pmu_counter_filtered */
> >
> > if (!(env->cp15.c9_pmcr & PMCRE) || !(env->cp15.c9_pmcnten & (1 << 31))) {
> > return false;
> > @@ -1006,6 +1015,44 @@ static inline bool arm_ccnt_enabled(CPUARMState *env)
> >
> > return true;
> > }
> > +
> > +/* Returns true if the counter corresponding to the passed-in pmevtyper or
> > + * pmccfiltr value is filtered using the current state */
>
> "is filtered (ie does not count events)" would make it clearer.
>
> Nit: */ should be on a line of its own.
Will do.
>
> > +static inline bool pmu_counter_filtered(CPUARMState *env, uint64_t pmxevtyper)
> > +{
> > + bool secure = arm_is_secure(env);
> > + int el = arm_current_el(env);
> > +
> > + bool P = pmxevtyper & PMXEVTYPER_P;
> > + bool U = pmxevtyper & PMXEVTYPER_U;
> > + bool NSK = pmxevtyper & PMXEVTYPER_NSK;
> > + bool NSU = pmxevtyper & PMXEVTYPER_NSU;
> > + bool NSH = pmxevtyper & PMXEVTYPER_NSH;
> > + bool M = pmxevtyper & PMXEVTYPER_M;
>
> Lowercase for variable names, please.
Will do.
> > +
> > + if (el == 1 && P) {
> > + return true;
> > + } else if (el == 0 && U) {
> > + return true;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (arm_feature(env, ARM_FEATURE_EL3)) {
> > + if (el == 1 && !secure && NSK != P) {
> > + return true;
> > + } else if (el == 0 && !secure && NSU != U) {
> > + return true;
> > + } else if (el == 3 && secure && M != P) {
> > + return true;
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (arm_feature(env, ARM_FEATURE_EL2) && el == 2 && !secure && !NSH) {
> > + return true;
> > + }
>
> This doesn't follow the structure that the Arm ARM pseudocode
> uses, which makes it a bit tricky to review. (see AArch64.CountEvents()).
> It also doesn't implement the same logic -- for instance this
> code will return true if we're in NS EL1 and the U bit is set,
> whereas the pseudocode returns true for NS EL1 only if U != NSU.
Okay, I'll take another look at this logic.
> > + return false;
> > +}
> > +
> > /*
> > * Ensure c15_ccnt is the guest-visible count so that operations such as
> > * enabling/disabling the counter or filtering, modifying the count itself,
> > @@ -1023,7 +1070,8 @@ uint64_t pmccntr_op_start(CPUARMState *env)
> > ARM_CPU_FREQ, NANOSECONDS_PER_SECOND);
> > #endif
> >
> > - if (arm_ccnt_enabled(env)) {
> > + if (arm_ccnt_enabled(env) &&
> > + !pmu_counter_filtered(env, env->cp15.pmccfiltr_el0)) {
> >
> > uint64_t eff_cycles = cycles;
> > if (env->cp15.c9_pmcr & PMCRD) {
> > @@ -1043,7 +1091,8 @@ uint64_t pmccntr_op_start(CPUARMState *env)
> > */
> > void pmccntr_op_finish(CPUARMState *env, uint64_t prev_cycles)
> > {
> > - if (arm_ccnt_enabled(env)) {
> > + if (arm_ccnt_enabled(env) &&
> > + !pmu_counter_filtered(env, env->cp15.pmccfiltr_el0)) {
> > if (env->cp15.c9_pmcr & PMCRD) {
> > /* Increment once every 64 processor clock cycles */
> > @@ -1054,10 +1103,30 @@ void pmccntr_op_finish(CPUARMState *env, uint64_t prev_cycles)
> > }
> > }
> >
> > +uint64_t pmu_op_start(CPUARMState *env)
> > +{
> > + return pmccntr_op_start(env);
> > +}
>
> Do these two functions end up being different at the end
> of the patchset?
Yes.
-Aaron
--
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the
Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-12 17:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 78+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-03-16 20:30 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 00/22] More fully implement ARM PMUv3 Aaron Lindsay
2018-03-16 20:30 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 01/22] target/arm: A53: Initialize PMCEID[01] Aaron Lindsay
2018-03-18 22:35 ` [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-arm] " Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2018-03-18 22:57 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2018-03-19 20:35 ` Aaron Lindsay
2018-03-20 1:03 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2018-03-21 15:17 ` Aaron Lindsay
2018-03-16 20:31 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 02/22] target/arm: A15 PMCEID0 initialization style nit Aaron Lindsay
2018-04-12 16:07 ` Peter Maydell
2018-03-16 20:31 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 03/22] target/arm: Check PMCNTEN for whether PMCCNTR is enabled Aaron Lindsay
2018-03-16 20:31 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 04/22] target/arm: Treat PMCCNTR as alias of PMCCNTR_EL0 Aaron Lindsay
2018-04-12 16:10 ` Peter Maydell
2018-04-12 16:56 ` Aaron Lindsay
2018-03-16 20:31 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 05/22] target/arm: Reorganize PMCCNTR read, write, sync Aaron Lindsay
2018-04-12 16:18 ` Peter Maydell
2018-04-13 13:51 ` Aaron Lindsay
2018-03-16 20:31 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 06/22] target/arm: Mask PMU register writes based on PMCR_EL0.N Aaron Lindsay
2018-04-12 16:24 ` Peter Maydell
2018-03-16 20:31 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 07/22] target/arm: Fetch GICv3 state directly from CPUARMState Aaron Lindsay
2018-04-12 16:28 ` Peter Maydell
2018-03-16 20:31 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 08/22] target/arm: Support multiple EL change hooks Aaron Lindsay
2018-03-18 22:41 ` [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-arm] " Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2018-03-20 20:45 ` Aaron Lindsay
2018-03-20 21:01 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2018-04-12 16:36 ` [Qemu-devel] " Peter Maydell
2018-03-16 20:31 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 09/22] target/arm: Add pre-EL " Aaron Lindsay
2018-04-12 16:49 ` Peter Maydell
2018-04-12 17:01 ` Aaron Lindsay
2018-04-12 17:21 ` Peter Maydell
2018-03-16 20:31 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 10/22] target/arm: Allow EL change hooks to do IO Aaron Lindsay
2018-04-12 16:53 ` Peter Maydell
2018-04-12 17:08 ` Aaron Lindsay
2018-04-12 17:21 ` Peter Maydell
2018-03-16 20:31 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 11/22] target/arm: Fix bitmask for PMCCFILTR writes Aaron Lindsay
2018-04-12 16:41 ` Peter Maydell
2018-04-13 18:15 ` Aaron Lindsay
2018-03-16 20:31 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 12/22] target/arm: Filter cycle counter based on PMCCFILTR_EL0 Aaron Lindsay
2018-04-12 17:15 ` Peter Maydell
2018-04-12 17:36 ` Aaron Lindsay [this message]
2018-04-17 15:21 ` Aaron Lindsay
2018-04-17 15:37 ` Peter Maydell
2018-04-17 20:03 ` Aaron Lindsay
2018-03-16 20:31 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 13/22] target/arm: Allow AArch32 access for PMCCFILTR Aaron Lindsay
2018-03-16 20:31 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 14/22] target/arm: Make PMOVSCLR 64 bits wide Aaron Lindsay
2018-03-18 23:14 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2018-03-19 15:24 ` Aaron Lindsay
2018-03-19 15:31 ` Peter Maydell
2018-03-20 1:01 ` [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-arm] " Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2018-03-16 20:31 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 15/22] target/arm: Add ARM_FEATURE_V7VE for v7 Virtualization Extensions Aaron Lindsay
2018-03-18 22:42 ` [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-arm] " Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2018-04-12 17:17 ` [Qemu-devel] " Peter Maydell
2018-04-17 14:23 ` Aaron Lindsay
2018-04-17 15:00 ` Peter Maydell
2018-04-24 20:35 ` Aaron Lindsay
2018-05-17 19:31 ` Aaron Lindsay
2018-05-31 14:18 ` Peter Maydell
2018-05-31 20:39 ` Aaron Lindsay
2018-06-01 8:57 ` Peter Maydell
2018-06-01 15:34 ` Aaron Lindsay
2018-06-01 15:59 ` Peter Maydell
2018-06-01 19:12 ` Aaron Lindsay
2018-03-16 20:31 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 16/22] target/arm: Implement PMOVSSET Aaron Lindsay
2018-04-12 17:28 ` Peter Maydell
2018-03-16 20:31 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 17/22] target/arm: Split arm_ccnt_enabled into generic pmu_counter_enabled Aaron Lindsay
2018-04-12 17:29 ` Peter Maydell
2018-03-16 20:31 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 18/22] target/arm: Add array for supported PMU events, generate PMCEID[01] Aaron Lindsay
2018-03-16 20:31 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 19/22] target/arm: Finish implementation of PM[X]EVCNTR and PM[X]EVTYPER Aaron Lindsay
2018-03-16 20:31 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 20/22] target/arm: PMU: Add instruction and cycle events Aaron Lindsay
2018-03-18 22:43 ` [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-arm] " Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2018-03-18 22:48 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2018-03-19 17:36 ` Aaron Lindsay
2018-03-16 20:31 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 21/22] target/arm: PMU: Set PMCR.N to 4 Aaron Lindsay
2018-03-16 20:31 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 22/22] target/arm: Implement PMSWINC Aaron Lindsay
2018-03-16 20:58 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 00/22] More fully implement ARM PMUv3 no-reply
2018-03-17 0:01 ` Aaron Lindsay
2018-04-12 17:17 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3] RFC: target/arm: Send interrupts on PMU counter overflow Aaron Lindsay
2018-04-12 17:32 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 00/22] More fully implement ARM PMUv3 Peter Maydell
2018-04-12 19:34 ` Aaron Lindsay
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180412173625.GK24561@codeaurora.org \
--to=alindsay@codeaurora.org \
--cc=alistair.francis@xilinx.com \
--cc=crosthwaite.peter@gmail.com \
--cc=digantd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=mspradli@codeaurora.org \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-arm@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=wei@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).