From: Niels de Vos <ndevos@redhat.com>
To: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Cc: Prasanna Kumar Kalever <prasanna.kalever@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] block/gluster: defend on legacy ftruncate api use
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2018 20:53:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180412185301.GC21158@ndevos-x270> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <74ea6d81-1800-d580-ecb1-6d85d83115bc@redhat.com>
On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 11:21:42AM -0500, Eric Blake wrote:
> n 04/12/2018 08:31 AM, Niels de Vos wrote:
> > This change looks good to me, but a commit message would have been
> > helpful. I suggest something like this:
> >
> > Gluster 4.0 changed the signature of glfs_ftruncate(). The function
> > now has two additional arguments, namely prestat and poststat. These
> > provide not benefit for QEMU, so ignoring them and passing NULL makes
> > the gluster-block driver compile with the new Gluster version again.
> >
> > And maybe add this too:
> >
> > Glusters libgfapi uses symbol versioning and provides backwards
> > compatible functions. Binaries compiled against previous versions of
> > Gluster keep on functioning with the new library.
> >
>
> >> @@ -3856,6 +3857,9 @@ if test "$glusterfs" != "no" ; then
> >> glusterfs_fallocate="yes"
> >> glusterfs_zerofill="yes"
> >> fi
> >> + if ! $pkg_config --atleast-version=7.4 glusterfs-api; then
> >> + glusterfs_legacy_ftruncate="yes"
>
> Also, version-based tests are lousy. Feature-based tests (does a call
> to glfs_ftruncate(0, 0) compile without error? then we are legacy) are
> less brittle, especially when features can be backported across
> versions. So this should be reworked to a compile check, rather than a
> version query.
In this case, the cange to glfs_ftruncate() will not be backported in
the releases from the Gluster Community or any distributions that I am
familiar with.
I agree that a compile-test is safer and can understand that those are
preferred over pkg-config version checks.
Niels
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-12 18:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-12 11:16 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] block/gluster: defend on legacy ftruncate api use Prasanna Kumar Kalever
2018-04-12 13:31 ` Niels de Vos
2018-04-12 16:21 ` Eric Blake
2018-04-12 18:53 ` Niels de Vos [this message]
2018-07-26 9:19 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] " Niels de Vos
2018-07-26 14:14 ` Eric Blake
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180412185301.GC21158@ndevos-x270 \
--to=ndevos@redhat.com \
--cc=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=prasanna.kalever@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).