From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34470) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f889d-0005Ex-7H for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 13:43:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f889Z-0004do-AV for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 13:43:01 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:44794) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f889Z-0004dI-3R for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 13:42:57 -0400 Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2018 14:42:52 -0300 From: Eduardo Habkost Message-ID: <20180416174252.GA23840@localhost.localdomain> References: <20180416163953.31188-1-ehabkost@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 0/1] i386: Don't automatically enable FEAT_KVM_HINTS bits List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Maydell Cc: Paolo Bonzini , QEMU Developers , Richard Henderson On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 05:57:35PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 16 April 2018 at 17:39, Eduardo Habkost wrote: > > Last remaining fix for -rc4. > > > > The following changes since commit 042f6a31af3d38eefc6ec995cce1d762c41d4515: > > > > Merge remote-tracking branch 'remotes/maxreitz/tags/pull-block-2018-04-16' into staging (2018-04-16 15:30:54 +0100) > > > > are available in the Git repository at: > > > > git://github.com/ehabkost/qemu.git tags/x86-next-pull-request > > > > for you to fetch changes up to 0d914f39a77954bf5472b16130aeefe573a068f5: > > > > i386: Don't automatically enable FEAT_KVM_HINTS bits (2018-04-16 13:36:52 -0300) > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > i386: Don't automatically enable FEAT_KVM_HINTS bits > > > > Bug fix for "-cpu host" with newer kernels. > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > Is this a regression since 2.11 ? Yes. -- Eduardo