From: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>,
Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>, Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] qemu-doc: Rework the network options chapter to make "-net" less prominent
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2018 15:20:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180417142050.GG15421@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <21d78c43-a6d9-95d8-ff3e-f80a9ce6b0c0@redhat.com>
On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 04:14:02PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 17/04/2018 16:05, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> >> For what it's worth, my "[RFC PATCH 00/32] Command line QAPIfication"
> >> replaces the original parsing art by getopt_long_only().
> >>
> >> Completing that work will take some time, but once it's done, we can
> >> (and I think we should) prefer double-dash for consistency.
> > Since our existing parser accepts single & double-dash already, is it
> > worth explicitly deprecating single-dash usage right now. So that when
> > your code comes along ready to merge, we're already able to say
> > "i told you so" and drop single-dash support at that same time.
>
> Serious questions: is _anyone_ of you actually using double-dash support
> in daily invocations of QEMU?
I rarely invoke QEMU myself, usually just let libvirt do it. So mostly
i just using qemu-img/nbd/etc which expect double-dash. I didn't actually
know QEMU supported double-dash until a year or so ago.
Regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-17 14:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-03-12 7:27 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] qemu-doc: Rework the network options chapter to make "-net" less prominent Thomas Huth
2018-03-12 9:07 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-03-12 12:06 ` Thomas Huth
2018-03-12 12:18 ` Eric Blake
2018-03-12 12:44 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-03-12 13:33 ` Thomas Huth
2018-04-17 13:56 ` Markus Armbruster
2018-04-17 14:05 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2018-04-17 14:14 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-04-17 14:20 ` Daniel P. Berrangé [this message]
2018-04-17 14:32 ` Markus Armbruster
2018-04-17 15:01 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2018-04-17 16:52 ` Thomas Huth
2018-04-17 16:56 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180417142050.GG15421@redhat.com \
--to=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).