From: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
To: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Cc: "Peter Xu" <peterx@redhat.com>,
"Stefan Hajnoczi" <stefanha@gmail.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
"Marc-André Lureau" <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>,
"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3] monitor: let cur_mon be per-thread
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2018 13:12:24 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180418051224.GD25649@stefanha-x1.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <874lkai4no.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4074 bytes --]
On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 11:05:47AM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> writes:
>
> > On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 05:17:32PM +0800, Peter Xu wrote:
> >> On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 04:37:48PM +0800, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> >> > On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 02:11:08PM +0800, Peter Xu wrote:
> >> > > In the future the monitor iothread may be accessing the cur_mon as
> >> > > well (via monitor_qmp_dispatch_one()). Before we introduce a real
> >> > > Out-Of-Band command, let's convert the cur_mon variable to be a
> >> > > per-thread variable to make sure there won't be a race between threads.
> >> > >
> >> > > Note that thread variables are not initialized to a valid value when new
> >> > > thread is created. However for our case we don't need to set it up,
> >> > > since the cur_mon variable is only used in such a pattern:
> >> > >
> >> > > old_mon = cur_mon;
> >> > > cur_mon = xxx;
> >> > > (do something, read cur_mon if necessary in the stack)
> >> > > cur_mon = old_mon;
> >> > >
> >> > > It plays a role as stack variable, so no need to be initialized at all.
> >> > > We only need to make sure the variable won't be changed unexpectedly by
> >> > > other threads.
> >> > >
> >> > > Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
> >> > > ---
> >> > > v3:
> >> > > - fix code style warning from patchew
> >> > > v2:
> >> > > - drop qemu-thread changes
> >> > > ---
> >> > > include/monitor/monitor.h | 2 +-
> >> > > monitor.c | 2 +-
> >> > > stubs/monitor.c | 2 +-
> >> > > tests/test-util-sockets.c | 2 +-
> >> > > 4 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >> >
> >> > The Monitor object is not fully thread-safe, so although the correct
> >> > cur_mon is now accessible, code may still be unsafe. For example,
> >> > monitor_get_fd(cur_mon, ...) is not thread-safe and must not be used by
> >> > OOB commands.
> >>
> >> IMHO things like monitor_get_fd() should only be called in QMP
> >> context, so there should always be a monitor_qmp_dispatch_one() in the
> >> stack already (no matter whether it is in main thread or the monitor
> >> iothread), which means that cur_mon should have been setup. So IMHO
> >> it's a programming error if monitor_get_fd() is called without correct
> >> cur_mon setup after this patch.
> >
> > The pointer value of cur_mon is not the issue, you have made that work
> > correctly. The problem is that some monitor.h APIs do not access the
> > Monitor object in a thread-safe fashion.
> >
> > Two QMP commands executing simultaneously in the main loop thread and
> > the monitor IOThread can hit race conditions. The example I gave was
> > the monitor_get_fd() API, which iterates and modifies the mon->fds
> > QLIST without a lock.
> >
> > Please audit monitor.h and either make things thread-safe or document
> > the thread-safety rules (e.g. "This function cannot be called from
> > out-of-band QMP context"). This wasn't necessary before but now that
> > you are adding multi-threading it is.
>
> Code working with the current thread's monitor via thread-local cur_mon
> is easier to analyze in some ways than code working with a Monitor *
> parameter: the latter can interfere with some other thread's monitor,
> and you may have to argue what values the parameter can take.
>
> You might want to replace parameters by cur_mon in certain cases.
>
> Funnily, the plan used to be the opposite. Commit 376253ece48: "On the
> mid or long term, those use case will be obsoleted so that [cur_mon] can
> be removed again."
Either way, the issue I described can still happen since two QMP
commands for a single Monitor object can execute simultaneously in the
main loop thread and the monitor IOThread.
I'm basically warning that QMP multi-threading isn't a solved problem
yet. It needs to be solved by a combination of making things
thread-safe, documentation, and assertions so code fails loudly and
early when called from an unsupported context.
Stefan
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 455 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-18 5:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-12 6:11 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3] monitor: let cur_mon be per-thread Peter Xu
2018-04-12 15:22 ` Eric Blake
2018-04-13 10:43 ` Marc-André Lureau
2018-04-16 8:37 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2018-04-16 9:17 ` Peter Xu
2018-04-17 7:08 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2018-04-17 9:05 ` Markus Armbruster
2018-04-18 5:12 ` Stefan Hajnoczi [this message]
2018-04-18 6:35 ` Peter Xu
2018-04-18 7:45 ` Markus Armbruster
2018-04-18 8:01 ` Peter Xu
2018-05-22 3:48 ` Peter Xu
2018-05-23 8:23 ` Markus Armbruster
2018-05-23 9:04 ` Peter Xu
2018-05-23 13:13 ` Markus Armbruster
2018-05-24 4:29 ` Peter Xu
2018-05-24 8:22 ` Markus Armbruster
2018-05-24 8:42 ` Peter Xu
2018-05-24 11:13 ` Markus Armbruster
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180418051224.GD25649@stefanha-x1.localdomain \
--to=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
--cc=marcandre.lureau@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).