From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46987) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f8hi4-0000D6-HR for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 18 Apr 2018 03:40:57 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f8hhz-00064O-Is for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 18 Apr 2018 03:40:56 -0400 Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2018 09:40:29 +0200 From: Cornelia Huck Message-ID: <20180418094029.14b64108.cohuck@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <354ba31f-7502-b873-e254-fe3dbfc07b54@de.ibm.com> References: <1523819244-29954-1-git-send-email-akrowiak@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1523819244-29954-4-git-send-email-akrowiak@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1808b8f3-9cff-c849-d012-b23f29d1c11f@redhat.com> <354ba31f-7502-b873-e254-fe3dbfc07b54@de.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 3/5] s390x/cpumodel: Set up CPU model for AP device support List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Christian Borntraeger Cc: David Hildenbrand , Tony Krowiak , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-s390x@nongnu.org, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com, bjsdjshi@linux.vnet.ibm.com, pmorel@linux.vnet.ibm.com, alifm@linux.vnet.ibm.com, mjrosato@linux.vnet.ibm.com, jjherne@linux.vnet.ibm.com, pasic@linux.vnet.ibm.com, eskultet@redhat.com, berrange@redhat.com, alex.williamson@redhat.com, eric.auger@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, peter.maydell@linaro.org, agraf@suse.de, rth@twiddle.net On Tue, 17 Apr 2018 20:21:31 +0200 Christian Borntraeger wrote: > On 04/16/2018 05:44 PM, David Hildenbrand wrote: > > > >> > >> diff --git a/target/s390x/gen-features.c b/target/s390x/gen-features.c > >> index 0cdbc15..0d5b0f7 100644 > >> --- a/target/s390x/gen-features.c > >> +++ b/target/s390x/gen-features.c > >> @@ -447,6 +447,9 @@ static uint16_t full_GEN12_GA1[] = { > >> S390_FEAT_ADAPTER_INT_SUPPRESSION, > >> S390_FEAT_EDAT_2, > >> S390_FEAT_SIDE_EFFECT_ACCESS_ESOP2, > >> + S390_FEAT_AP_QUERY_CONFIG_INFO, > >> + S390_FEAT_AP_FACILITIES_TEST, > >> + S390_FEAT_AP, > >> }; > >> > > > > Now I have to ask a very stupid question: > > > > I heard that the execution controls in the SIE block for AP are one of > > the oldest ones we have around. How can it be that the AP feature cannot > > be used before zEC12? > > It was a suggestion from the crypto team due to testability. Nobody has a z196 > with the older cards. > Might be worth adding a note to that respect?