Re: [Qemu-devel] [qemu RFC v2] qapi: add "firmware.json"

["Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>]

On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 05:27:32PM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> On 04/18/18 17:17, Eric Blake wrote:
> > On 04/18/2018 07:40 AM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> > 
> >> Is it guaranteed that lists in JSON keep the order of the elements?
> >> Because, dictionaries definitely don't promise any ordering between the
> >> keys.
> > 
> > Yes, JSON lists preserve order (and we have to explicitly document cases
> > where order within a list is not significant).
> > 
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> After digesting the comments on @type for a while longer, from Dan, Gerd
> and Paolo, I think we *should* keep @type, but rather than having it be
> a simple enum, let's make it a list of enums, where order matters. Keep
> @features separate, and document that order does not matter there.
> 
> Here's why: my brain is crashing trying to come up with a
> human-parseable explanation why for *some* entries in @features, their
> relative order is important, and why for some others, it isn't.
> Discerning the subset for which order matters, from any specific
> grab-bag of @features, will be no fun for the human user.
> 
> Given that the "ordered features" idea was brought to life solely
> because a firmware can provide multiple interfaces (with a strong
> preference order between them), I guess we might as well be honest about
> that, and update @type accordingly.
> 
> Thoughts? :)

Keeping type separate from features is fine by me.


Regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: https://berrange.com      -o-    https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org         -o-            https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org    -o-    https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|