From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58482) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f9KSW-0004gb-5h for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 19 Apr 2018 21:03:29 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f9KSS-0002LV-8p for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 19 Apr 2018 21:03:28 -0400 Received: from mx3-rdu2.redhat.com ([66.187.233.73]:47570 helo=mx1.redhat.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f9KSS-0002Ju-34 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 19 Apr 2018 21:03:24 -0400 Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2018 11:03:01 +1000 From: David Gibson Message-ID: <20180420110301.1734899d@umbus.fritz.box> In-Reply-To: References: <20180417224054.26363-1-lersek@redhat.com> <20180418060243.iafg4wj5gwsruop5@sirius.home.kraxel.org> <20180419100900.7b66fde0@umbus.fritz.box> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; boundary="Sig_/OcicRh1/0_jXM_u.vM/a/MM"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [qemu RFC v2] qapi: add "firmware.json" List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Laszlo Ersek Cc: Gerd Hoffmann , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, libvir-list@redhat.com, "Daniel P. Berrange" , Alexander Graf , Ard Biesheuvel , Eric Blake , Gary Ching-Pang Lin , Kashyap Chamarthy , Markus Armbruster , Michael Roth , Michal Privoznik , Paolo Bonzini , Peter Krempa , Peter Maydell , Thomas Huth --Sig_/OcicRh1/0_jXM_u.vM/a/MM Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 19 Apr 2018 10:09:30 +0200 Laszlo Ersek wrote: > On 04/19/18 02:09, David Gibson wrote: > [...] =20 > [...] =20 > [...] =20 > [...] =20 > [...] =20 > [...] =20 > [...] =20 > [...] =20 > [...] =20 >=20 > Thank you -- I will replace SLOF with "openfirmware". >=20 > This also implies I shouldn't add "openbios" separately, which was > suggested earlier by Gerd -- according to > , OpenBIOS is another > implementation of OFW. Right. Although I think OpenBIOS and SLOF support a disjoint set of machines. Openhackware which is (was?) used on some machines is yet another (very partial) openfirmware implementation. >=20 > [...] =20 >=20 > Right, this is about interfaces, so I'll keep "uboot". Ok. More specifically I guess this is about firmware <-> guest OS, and firmware <-> interactive user interfaces. Firmware <-> qemu interfaces (fw_cfg, device tree) are a different question. --=20 David Gibson Principal Software Engineer, Virtualization, Red Hat --Sig_/OcicRh1/0_jXM_u.vM/a/MM Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEdfRlhq5hpmzETofcbDjKyiDZs5IFAlrZPEUACgkQbDjKyiDZ s5LRxhAAp3eI2K1/JcwjNxwmQ+aMMBL/sKbOrBs/OQzrRVAhmx76vEeuw7G8fwPM Rt4bL9o1ahNaP8cH1ijVBM6C4vdBtGdGiYLk2sQxUTIDNjeEAgjmUeMLW5+gZHWf h+1eFaoAWwXv1NzJgY51l0wkk175Ib4B5RBX1tZnIQY4qHp4FDgxbC5E5MyP/RU7 iBxT6VH4f1vpgxx089uYFqFhAZttG3QffDvvbSvU4RungUGowmU2ymRjfIRE500u 5ydT9Z/kH34K37/1liFdsLritcgFQAu65Wagx0Q2mkA8r41Qq25pbcW77OXvgsaB eEbiUHyZ79XdepkMOewBCKWTZy+UvUVTyfifYV3v4ZvYPE8z3pyLqB+uRgP00g2A fjsgscg9ljexlJulMLgjIBPYMP4ekWsKng6b9BD0A9MlPN0IRucvYzdC9wwxp2dt xa8Utd8sayAB/hlM4FHof/RuL/oJPii4xN1A34KypFvxBtMCDY7CjRXjI92iAQAz N2KuZcTW/Hs2plGc4swoQORCSZEikrmx6L3jSxqEz6JYdhVFGdOcyWWco/UcgAYB gDonHcv1XqP9L6L/96mwjHrA7/hch41zic5WtVoOtWZG4TZcKxrcWWZaBSCSAEN0 9n3Gzmv5Sqewy6lST0aHqRSG/H7cJvoL84WcKfnfEqNSZgpEmFk= =T9t6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/OcicRh1/0_jXM_u.vM/a/MM--