From: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-s390x@nongnu.org,
Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>,
Marcel Apfelbaum <marcel@redhat.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>,
David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>,
Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>,
qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, Pankaj Gupta <pagupta@redhat.com>,
Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 00/11] pc-dimm: factor out MemoryDevice
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2018 17:47:53 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180423204753.GS29865@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180423204018-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 08:40:59PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 06:51:15PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> > Right now we can only map PCDIMM/NVDIMM into guest address space. In the
> > future, we might want to do the same for virtio devices - e.g.
> > virtio-pmem or virtio-mem. Especially, they should be able to live side
> > by side to each other.
> >
> > E.g. the virto based memory devices regions will not be exposed via ACPI
> > and friends. They will be detected just like other virtio devices and
> > indicate the applicable memory region. This makes it possible to also use
> > them on architectures without memory device detection support (e.g. s390x).
> >
> > Let's factor out the memory device code into a MemoryDevice interface.
> >
> > Please note that the "slots" assignment code is not relevant for memory
> > devices that will not be exposed via ACPI or similar. That's why that
> > part won't be exposed. KVM/vhost "slots" for memory regions are still
> > necessary but don't have to be manually specified (e.g. the slot number
> > doesn't mather).
> >
> > So we are basically converting the hotplug memory region to a memory device
> > region. I have patches that also set up such a region for s390x.
>
> Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
>
> Who's merging this? Eduardo?
I just queued it. Thanks!
--
Eduardo
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-23 20:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-23 16:51 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 00/11] pc-dimm: factor out MemoryDevice David Hildenbrand
2018-04-23 16:51 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 01/11] pc-dimm: factor out MemoryDevice interface David Hildenbrand
2018-04-23 16:51 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 02/11] machine: make MemoryHotplugState accessible via the machine David Hildenbrand
2018-05-04 19:26 ` Eduardo Habkost
2018-05-05 5:34 ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2018-05-07 8:42 ` [Qemu-devel] [qemu-s390x] " David Hildenbrand
2018-05-10 16:57 ` [Qemu-devel] " Paolo Bonzini
2018-05-10 17:52 ` Eduardo Habkost
2018-05-14 6:31 ` Markus Armbruster
2018-04-23 16:51 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 03/11] pc-dimm: no need to pass the memory region David Hildenbrand
2018-04-23 16:51 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 04/11] pc-dimm: pass in the machine and to the MemoryHotplugState David Hildenbrand
2018-04-23 16:51 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 05/11] pc-dimm: factor out address search into MemoryDevice code David Hildenbrand
2018-04-23 16:51 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 06/11] pc-dimm: factor out capacity and slot checks into MemoryDevice David Hildenbrand
2018-04-23 16:51 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 07/11] pc-dimm: move actual plug/unplug of a memory region to MemoryDevice David Hildenbrand
2018-04-23 16:51 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 08/11] machine: rename MemoryHotplugState to DeviceMemoryState David Hildenbrand
2018-04-23 16:51 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 09/11] pc: rename "hotplug memory" terminology to "device memory" David Hildenbrand
2018-04-23 16:51 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 10/11] spapr: " David Hildenbrand
2018-04-23 23:29 ` David Gibson
2018-04-23 16:51 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 11/11] vl: allow 'maxmem' without 'slot' David Hildenbrand
2018-04-23 17:40 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 00/11] pc-dimm: factor out MemoryDevice Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-04-23 20:47 ` Eduardo Habkost [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180423204753.GS29865@localhost.localdomain \
--to=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=marcel@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pagupta@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-ppc@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
--cc=rth@twiddle.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).