From: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
To: 858585 jemmy <jemmy858585@gmail.com>
Cc: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>,
Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
Gal Shachaf <galsha@mellanox.com>,
Aviad Yehezkel <aviadye@mellanox.com>,
licq@mellanox.com, adido@mellanox.com,
Lidong Chen <lidongchen@tencent.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 4/5] migration: implement bi-directional RDMA QIOChannel
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2018 10:18:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180430091833.GF3249@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOGPPbcG4-FiV1d134g5YA8z4cNrdzELED3rpR+NrJzc2OfwcA@mail.gmail.com>
On Sat, Apr 28, 2018 at 12:16:36PM +0800, 858585 jemmy wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 5:16 PM, Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> wrote:
> so I prefer to add a lock for QEMUFile struct, like this:
>
> int qemu_fclose(QEMUFile *f)
> {
> int ret;
> qemu_fflush(f);
> ret = qemu_file_get_error(f);
>
> if (f->ops->close) {
> + qemu_mutex_lock(&f->lock);
> int ret2 = f->ops->close(f->opaque);
> + qemu_mutex_unlock(&f->lock);
> if (ret >= 0) {
> ret = ret2;
> }
> }
That looks ok
> >> > But is there nothing else to make the QIOChannel bidirectional?
> >> >
> >> > Also, a lot seems dependent on listen_id, can you explain how that's
> >> > being used.
> >>
> >> The destination qemu is server side, so listen_id is not zero. the
> >> source qemu is client side,
> >> the listen_id is zero.
> >> I use listen_id to determine whether qemu is destination or source.
> >>
> >> for the destination qemu, if write data to source, it need use the
> >> return_path rdma, like this:
> >> if (rdma->listen_id) {
> >> rdma = rdma->return_path;
> >> }
> >>
> >> for the source qemu, if read data from destination, it also need use
> >> the return_path rdma.
> >> if (!rdma->listen_id) {
> >> rdma = rdma->return_path;
> >> }
> >
> > This feels uncessarily complex to me. Why not just change QIOCHannelRMDA
> > struct, so that it has 2 RDMA context pointers eg
> >
> > struct QIOChannelRDMA {
> > QIOChannel parent;
> > RDMAContext *rdmain;
> > RDMAContext *rdmaout;
> > QEMUFile *file;
> > bool blocking; /* XXX we don't actually honour this yet */
> > };
>
> The reason is the parameter of some function is RDMAContext.
> like qemu_rdma_accept, rdma_start_outgoing_migration.
> It's easier to implement return path.
I don't see that as an issue - qemu_fopen_rdma() function should be able
to setup a pair of RDMAContext pointers when it creates the QIOChannelRDMA
struct. It just has to request the return path from the single RDMAContext
it gets passed, and then set that on the QIOChannelRDMA struct.
Regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-30 9:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-25 14:35 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/5] Enable postcopy RDMA live migration Lidong Chen
2018-04-25 14:35 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 1/5] migration: disable RDMA WRITE after postcopy started Lidong Chen
2018-04-26 16:11 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2018-04-25 14:35 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 2/5] migration: create a dedicated connection for rdma return path Lidong Chen
2018-04-26 16:19 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2018-04-25 14:35 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 3/5] migration: remove unnecessary variables len in QIOChannelRDMA Lidong Chen
2018-04-26 16:40 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2018-04-27 3:51 ` 858585 jemmy
2018-04-27 9:01 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2018-04-27 9:04 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2018-04-25 14:35 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 4/5] migration: implement bi-directional RDMA QIOChannel Lidong Chen
2018-04-26 17:36 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2018-04-27 7:56 ` 858585 jemmy
2018-04-27 9:16 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2018-04-28 4:16 ` 858585 jemmy
2018-04-30 9:18 ` Daniel P. Berrangé [this message]
2018-04-25 14:35 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 5/5] migration: Stop rdma yielding during incoming postcopy Lidong Chen
2018-04-26 17:54 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180430091833.GF3249@redhat.com \
--to=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=adido@mellanox.com \
--cc=aviadye@mellanox.com \
--cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
--cc=galsha@mellanox.com \
--cc=jemmy858585@gmail.com \
--cc=licq@mellanox.com \
--cc=lidongchen@tencent.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=quintela@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).