From: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
To: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Cc: "Thomas Huth" <thuth@redhat.com>,
qemu-arm@nongnu.org, qemu-ppc@nongnu.org,
"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <f4bug@amsat.org>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH] tests/device-introspect: Test devices with all machines, not only with "none"
Date: Mon, 7 May 2018 15:21:26 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180507182126.GC25013@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87h8njtnok.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org>
On Mon, May 07, 2018 at 06:50:35PM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com> writes:
>
> > On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 08:31:58AM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> >> Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com> writes:
> >>
> >> > On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 05:20:25PM +0200, Thomas Huth wrote:
> >> >> On 26.04.2018 13:45, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> >> >> > Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> writes:
> >> >> [...]
> >> >> >> @@ -260,6 +263,26 @@ static void test_abstract_interfaces(void)
> >> >> >> qtest_end();
> >> >> >> }
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> +static void add_machine_test_case(const char *mname)
> >> >> >> +{
> >> >> >> + char *path, *args;
> >> >> >> +
> >> >> >> + /* Ignore blacklisted machines */
> >> >> >> + if (g_str_equal("xenfv", mname) || g_str_equal("xenpv", mname)) {
> >> >> >> + return;
> >> >> >> + }
> >> >> >> +
> >> >> >> + path = g_strdup_printf("device/introspect/concrete-defaults-%s", mname);
> >> >> >> + args = g_strdup_printf("-machine %s", mname);
> >> >> >> + qtest_add_data_func(path, args, test_device_intro_concrete);
> >> >> >
> >> >> > This runs test_device_intro_concrete() with "-machine M" for all machine
> >> >> > types M, in SPEED=slow mode.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> + g_free(path);
> >> >> >> +
> >> >> >> + path = g_strdup_printf("device/introspect/concrete-nodefaults-%s", mname);
> >> >> >> + args = g_strdup_printf("-nodefaults -machine %s", mname);
> >> >> >> + qtest_add_data_func(path, args, test_device_intro_concrete);
> >> >> >
> >> >> > This runs test_device_intro_concrete() with "-nodefaults -machine M" for
> >> >> > all machine types M, in SPEED=slow mode.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Has "without -nodefaults" exposed additional bugs?
> >> >>
> >> >> After testing this with all machines, I had to discover that
> >> >> "-nodefaults" does not work so easily: A lot of the embedded machines
> >> >> (especially the ARM machines) simply refuse to work with "-nodefaults"
> >> >> and exit immediately instead. E.g.:
> >> >>
> >> >> $ arm-softmmu/qemu-system-arm -nodefaults -nographic -M n810,accel=qtest
> >> >> qemu-system-arm: missing SecureDigital device
> >>
> >> These are all bugs. --nodefaults is supposed to suppress *optional*
> >> devices, not mandatory ones.
> >
> > I'm not sure I understand the requirements. What exactly is the
> > definition of "mandatory"?
> >
> > A machine created by "qemu-system-x86_64 -machine pc -nodefaults"
> > is useless because it has no any device to boot from. How is
> > that different from a n810 machine not booting because there's no
> > SD device?
>
> I propose:
>
> * Stuff that's required for QEMU to run is not suppressed by -nodefaults
>
> * Stuff that a real machine has soldered on is also not suppressed
>
> * Stuff that can be pulled out of a real machine may be suppressed, even
> when that means the guest won't run
Makes sense to me. It looks like the only obstacle for
tests/device-introspect and device-crash-test is the first rule.
"Guest won't boot" isn't a problem, but "QEMU won't run" is.
The first rule is easily testable, too: running
"$QEMU -machine $MACHINE -nodefaults" and not having a working
QMP monitor should be reported as a bug by automated tests.
Do we have an up-to-date list of machines that break this rule?
We can add this to
<https://wiki.qemu.org/Contribute/BiteSizedTasks>.
--
Eduardo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-07 18:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-03-19 9:39 [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH] tests/device-introspect: Test devices with all machines, not only with "none" Thomas Huth
2018-03-19 20:37 ` Eduardo Habkost
2018-04-17 12:12 ` Markus Armbruster
2018-04-17 12:52 ` [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-arm] " Peter Maydell
2018-04-17 13:15 ` Markus Armbruster
2018-04-26 10:24 ` [Qemu-devel] " Thomas Huth
2018-04-26 11:54 ` Markus Armbruster
2018-04-26 15:27 ` Thomas Huth
2018-04-27 0:34 ` Eduardo Habkost
2018-04-27 3:45 ` Thomas Huth
2018-04-27 6:06 ` [Qemu-devel] qom-test (was: [RFC PATCH] tests/device-introspect: Test devices with all machines, not only with "none") Thomas Huth
2018-04-27 6:29 ` [Qemu-devel] qom-test Markus Armbruster
2018-04-27 10:20 ` [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-arm] qom-test (was: [RFC PATCH] tests/device-introspect: Test devices with all machines, not only with "none") Peter Maydell
2018-04-27 10:24 ` [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-arm] qom-test Thomas Huth
2018-04-27 16:30 ` Markus Armbruster
2018-04-27 16:36 ` [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-ppc] " Thomas Huth
2018-04-26 11:45 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH] tests/device-introspect: Test devices with all machines, not only with "none" Markus Armbruster
2018-04-26 15:20 ` Thomas Huth
2018-04-27 0:32 ` Eduardo Habkost
2018-04-27 3:52 ` Thomas Huth
2018-04-27 6:31 ` Markus Armbruster
2018-04-27 7:31 ` Thomas Huth
2018-04-27 8:05 ` Markus Armbruster
2018-05-07 13:53 ` Eduardo Habkost
2018-05-07 16:50 ` Markus Armbruster
2018-05-07 17:02 ` Thomas Huth
2018-05-07 17:04 ` [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-arm] " Peter Maydell
2018-05-07 18:21 ` Eduardo Habkost [this message]
2018-05-07 19:13 ` [Qemu-devel] " Thomas Huth
2018-05-07 19:32 ` Eduardo Habkost
2018-05-08 5:33 ` [Qemu-devel] Running QEMU without default devices / kernel / bios (was: Test devices with all machines, not only with "none") Thomas Huth
2018-05-08 10:47 ` [Qemu-devel] Running QEMU without default devices / kernel / bios Thomas Huth
2018-05-08 16:40 ` [Qemu-devel] Running QEMU without default devices / kernel / bios (was: Test devices with all machines, not only with "none") Eduardo Habkost
2018-05-09 7:41 ` [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-ppc] Running QEMU without default devices / kernel / bios Thomas Huth
2018-05-09 11:36 ` Markus Armbruster
2018-05-08 5:41 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH] tests/device-introspect: Test devices with all machines, not only with "none" Markus Armbruster
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180507182126.GC25013@localhost.localdomain \
--to=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=f4bug@amsat.org \
--cc=qemu-arm@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-ppc@nongnu.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).