From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43424) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fFlcG-0003IJ-CA for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 07 May 2018 15:16:09 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fFlcC-0007lW-Cf for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 07 May 2018 15:16:08 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:48868) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fFlcC-0007lF-4W for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 07 May 2018 15:16:04 -0400 Date: Mon, 7 May 2018 16:15:55 -0300 From: Eduardo Habkost Message-ID: <20180507191555.GD13350@localhost.localdomain> References: <1524760009-24710-1-git-send-email-babu.moger@amd.com> <1524760009-24710-6-git-send-email-babu.moger@amd.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1524760009-24710-6-git-send-email-babu.moger@amd.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v7 5/9] i386: Use the statically loaded cache definitions List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Babu Moger Cc: mst@redhat.com, marcel@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, rth@twiddle.net, mtosatti@redhat.com, geoff@hostfission.com, kash@tripleback.net, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 11:26:45AM -0500, Babu Moger wrote: > Use the statically loaded cache definitions if available > and legacy-cache parameter is not set. > > Signed-off-by: Babu Moger > Tested-by: Geoffrey McRae Looks good, but I suggest squashing this with patch 4/9. Additional suggestion below: > --- > target/i386/cpu.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++----- > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/target/i386/cpu.c b/target/i386/cpu.c > index a27b658..56d2f0b 100644 > --- a/target/i386/cpu.c > +++ b/target/i386/cpu.c > @@ -3941,8 +3941,13 @@ void cpu_x86_cpuid(CPUX86State *env, uint32_t index, uint32_t count, > (L1_ITLB_2M_ASSOC << 8) | (L1_ITLB_2M_ENTRIES); > *ebx = (L1_DTLB_4K_ASSOC << 24) | (L1_DTLB_4K_ENTRIES << 16) | \ > (L1_ITLB_4K_ASSOC << 8) | (L1_ITLB_4K_ENTRIES); > - *ecx = encode_cache_cpuid80000005(&l1d_cache_amd); > - *edx = encode_cache_cpuid80000005(&l1i_cache_amd); We could rename l1*_cache_amd and l2_cache_amd to "legacy_*_cache_amd", to make it clear they are just legacy cache settings. > + if (env->cache_info.valid && !cpu->legacy_cache) { > + *ecx = encode_cache_cpuid80000005(&env->cache_info.l1d_cache); > + *edx = encode_cache_cpuid80000005(&env->cache_info.l1i_cache); > + } else { > + *ecx = encode_cache_cpuid80000005(&l1d_cache_amd); > + *edx = encode_cache_cpuid80000005(&l1i_cache_amd); > + } > break; > case 0x80000006: > /* cache info (L2 cache) */ > @@ -3958,9 +3963,16 @@ void cpu_x86_cpuid(CPUX86State *env, uint32_t index, uint32_t count, > (L2_DTLB_4K_ENTRIES << 16) | \ > (AMD_ENC_ASSOC(L2_ITLB_4K_ASSOC) << 12) | \ > (L2_ITLB_4K_ENTRIES); > - encode_cache_cpuid80000006(&l2_cache_amd, > - cpu->enable_l3_cache ? &l3_cache : NULL, > - ecx, edx); > + if (env->cache_info.valid && !cpu->legacy_cache) { > + encode_cache_cpuid80000006(&env->cache_info.l2_cache, > + cpu->enable_l3_cache ? > + &env->cache_info.l3_cache : NULL, > + ecx, edx); > + } else { > + encode_cache_cpuid80000006(&l2_cache_amd, > + cpu->enable_l3_cache ? &l3_cache : NULL, > + ecx, edx); > + } > break; > case 0x80000007: > *eax = 0; > -- > 2.7.4 > > -- Eduardo