From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com>
Cc: "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Eduardo Habkost" <ehabkost@redhat.com>,
"qemu-devel@nongnu.org Developers" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
kvm <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, "Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RESEND v2] i386/kvm: add support for KVM_CAP_X86_DISABLE_EXITS
Date: Sat, 12 May 2018 00:57:59 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180512005735-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANRm+CxGRxrpybqjqicauF2ROZs7+76uReMBmpNRdzM=dDWUZg@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 09:09:19AM +0800, Wanpeng Li wrote:
> 2018-04-18 2:08 GMT+08:00 Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>:
> > On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 01:24:15AM -0700, Wanpeng Li wrote:
> >> From: Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>
> >>
> >> This patch adds support for KVM_CAP_X86_DISABLE_EXITS. Provides userspace with
> >> per-VM capability(KVM_CAP_X86_DISABLE_EXITS) to not intercept MWAIT/HLT/PAUSE
> >> in order that to improve latency in some workloads.
> >>
> >> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> >> Cc: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
> >> Cc: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>
> >> ---
> >>
> >> linux-headers/linux/kvm.h | 6 +++++-
> >> target/i386/cpu.h | 2 ++
> >> target/i386/kvm.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
> >> 3 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/linux-headers/linux/kvm.h b/linux-headers/linux/kvm.h
> >> index a167be8..857df15 100644
> >> --- a/linux-headers/linux/kvm.h
> >> +++ b/linux-headers/linux/kvm.h
> >> @@ -925,7 +925,7 @@ struct kvm_ppc_resize_hpt {
> >> #define KVM_CAP_S390_GS 140
> >> #define KVM_CAP_S390_AIS 141
> >> #define KVM_CAP_SPAPR_TCE_VFIO 142
> >> -#define KVM_CAP_X86_GUEST_MWAIT 143
> >> +#define KVM_CAP_X86_DISABLE_EXITS 143
> >> #define KVM_CAP_ARM_USER_IRQ 144
> >> #define KVM_CAP_S390_CMMA_MIGRATION 145
> >> #define KVM_CAP_PPC_FWNMI 146
> >> @@ -1508,6 +1508,10 @@ struct kvm_assigned_msix_entry {
> >> #define KVM_X2APIC_API_USE_32BIT_IDS (1ULL << 0)
> >> #define KVM_X2APIC_API_DISABLE_BROADCAST_QUIRK (1ULL << 1)
> >>
> >> +#define KVM_X86_DISABLE_EXITS_MWAIT (1 << 0)
> >> +#define KVM_X86_DISABLE_EXITS_HLT (1 << 1)
> >> +#define KVM_X86_DISABLE_EXITS_PAUSE (1 << 2)
> >> +
> >> /* Available with KVM_CAP_ARM_USER_IRQ */
> >>
> >> /* Bits for run->s.regs.device_irq_level */
> >> diff --git a/target/i386/cpu.h b/target/i386/cpu.h
> >> index 1b219fa..965de1b 100644
> >> --- a/target/i386/cpu.h
> >> +++ b/target/i386/cpu.h
> >> @@ -685,6 +685,8 @@ typedef uint32_t FeatureWordArray[FEATURE_WORDS];
> >> #define CPUID_7_0_EDX_AVX512_4FMAPS (1U << 3) /* AVX512 Multiply Accumulation Single Precision */
> >> #define CPUID_7_0_EDX_SPEC_CTRL (1U << 26) /* Speculation Control */
> >>
> >> +#define KVM_PV_UNHALT (1U << 7)
> >> +
> >
> > Why don't we use KVM_FEATURE_PV_UNHALT from kvm_para.h?
> >
> >> #define KVM_HINTS_DEDICATED (1U << 0)
> >>
> >
> > BTW I wonder whether we should switch to a value from
> > kvm_para.h? I'll send a version to do it, pls take a look.
>
> Yeah, your patchset looks good.
>
> Regards,
> Wanpeng Li
Do you plan to rebase your patch and upstream it or do you expect me to
do it?
> >
> >
> >> #define CPUID_8000_0008_EBX_IBPB (1U << 12) /* Indirect Branch Prediction Barrier */
> >> diff --git a/target/i386/kvm.c b/target/i386/kvm.c
> >> index 6c49954..3e99830 100644
> >> --- a/target/i386/kvm.c
> >> +++ b/target/i386/kvm.c
> >> @@ -1029,6 +1029,22 @@ int kvm_arch_init_vcpu(CPUState *cs)
> >> }
> >> }
> >>
> >> + if (env->features[FEAT_KVM_HINTS] & KVM_HINTS_DEDICATED) {
> >> + int disable_exits = kvm_check_extension(cs->kvm_state, KVM_CAP_X86_DISABLE_EXITS);
> >> +
> >> + if (disable_exits) {
> >> + disable_exits &= (KVM_X86_DISABLE_EXITS_MWAIT |
> >> + KVM_X86_DISABLE_EXITS_HLT |
> >> + KVM_X86_DISABLE_EXITS_PAUSE);
> >> + if (env->user_features[FEAT_KVM] & KVM_PV_UNHALT) {
> >> + disable_exits &= ~KVM_X86_DISABLE_EXITS_HLT;
> >> + }
> >> + }
> >> + if (kvm_vm_enable_cap(cs->kvm_state, KVM_CAP_X86_DISABLE_EXITS, 0, disable_exits)) {
> >> + error_report("kvm: DISABLE EXITS not supported");
> >> + }
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> qemu_add_vm_change_state_handler(cpu_update_state, env);
> >>
> >> c = cpuid_find_entry(&cpuid_data.cpuid, 1, 0);
> >> --
> >> 2.7.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-11 21:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-17 8:24 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RESEND v2] i386/kvm: add support for KVM_CAP_X86_DISABLE_EXITS Wanpeng Li
2018-04-17 8:28 ` no-reply
2018-04-17 18:08 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-04-18 1:09 ` Wanpeng Li
2018-05-11 21:57 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2018-05-12 0:49 ` Wanpeng Li
2018-04-17 20:59 ` Eduardo Habkost
2018-04-18 1:20 ` Wanpeng Li
2018-04-19 15:48 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-04-19 19:56 ` Eduardo Habkost
2018-04-19 21:32 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-04-19 21:53 ` Eduardo Habkost
2018-05-11 22:12 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-05-16 12:34 ` Eduardo Habkost
2018-05-16 14:26 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-05-17 17:34 ` Eduardo Habkost
2018-05-17 17:57 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-05-17 18:18 ` Eduardo Habkost
2018-05-16 12:44 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-05-16 14:22 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-05-16 15:04 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-05-16 15:13 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-05-16 15:33 ` Eduardo Habkost
2018-05-16 16:21 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-05-16 17:20 ` Eduardo Habkost
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180512005735-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=kernellwp@gmail.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).