From: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Wanpeng Li" <kernellwp@gmail.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
"Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RESEND v2] i386/kvm: add support for KVM_CAP_X86_DISABLE_EXITS
Date: Wed, 16 May 2018 12:33:50 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180516153350.GM25013@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180516180847-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 06:13:17PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 05:04:41PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > On 16/05/2018 16:22, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > >> kvm-hint-dedicated=on only sets the CPUID bit, which Linux for example
> > >> uses that to disable pv spinlocks. "-realtime dedicated-cpus=on" only
> > >> disables the vmexits. You can use the two independently.
> > >
> > > But when would you want to use the two independently?
> >
> > 1) For testing
> >
> > 2) When some of your QEMUs are too old to support kvm-hint-dedicated=on,
> > you may still want to use -realtime dedicated-cpus=on to get better
> > performance on the new one.
> >
> > Paolo
>
> For the second purpose, can't we handle this using machine types?
Machine-type compatibility code deals with defaults when options
are omitted, not for making the meaning of explicit options
depend on the machine-type.
e.g. having "-machine pc-q35-2.11 -cpu ...,+kvm-hint-dedicated=on"
not expose the CPUID bit that was explicitly requested in the
command-line would be a bad idea.
--
Eduardo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-16 15:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-17 8:24 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RESEND v2] i386/kvm: add support for KVM_CAP_X86_DISABLE_EXITS Wanpeng Li
2018-04-17 8:28 ` no-reply
2018-04-17 18:08 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-04-18 1:09 ` Wanpeng Li
2018-05-11 21:57 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-05-12 0:49 ` Wanpeng Li
2018-04-17 20:59 ` Eduardo Habkost
2018-04-18 1:20 ` Wanpeng Li
2018-04-19 15:48 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-04-19 19:56 ` Eduardo Habkost
2018-04-19 21:32 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-04-19 21:53 ` Eduardo Habkost
2018-05-11 22:12 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-05-16 12:34 ` Eduardo Habkost
2018-05-16 14:26 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-05-17 17:34 ` Eduardo Habkost
2018-05-17 17:57 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-05-17 18:18 ` Eduardo Habkost
2018-05-16 12:44 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-05-16 14:22 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-05-16 15:04 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-05-16 15:13 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-05-16 15:33 ` Eduardo Habkost [this message]
2018-05-16 16:21 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-05-16 17:20 ` Eduardo Habkost
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180516153350.GM25013@localhost.localdomain \
--to=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=kernellwp@gmail.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).