From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52221) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fJkKI-0002db-H9 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 18 May 2018 14:42:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fJkKH-0004Vm-PB for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 18 May 2018 14:42:02 -0400 Date: Fri, 18 May 2018 19:41:51 +0100 From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" Message-ID: <20180518184151.GA2479@work-vm> References: <20180518132114.4070-1-kwolf@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180518132114.4070-1-kwolf@redhat.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 00/40] Generic background jobs List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Kevin Wolf , marcandre.lureau@redhat.com Cc: qemu-block@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, jsnow@redhat.com, jcody@redhat.com, armbru@redhat.com, mreitz@redhat.com * Kevin Wolf (kwolf@redhat.com) wrote: > Before we can make x-blockdev-create a background job, we need to > generalise the job infrastructure so that it can be used without any > associated block node. Is there any relationship between what this does, and what Marc-Andr=E9's 'monitor: add asynchronous command type' tries to do? (See 20180326150916.9602-1-marcandre.lureau@redhat.com 26th March) Dave -- Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilbert@redhat.com / Manchester, UK