From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55902) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fNBeS-0002RD-SQ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 28 May 2018 02:29:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fNBeP-0008Av-Of for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 28 May 2018 02:29:04 -0400 Received: from mx3-rdu2.redhat.com ([66.187.233.73]:44978 helo=mx1.redhat.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fNBeP-0008AX-Kg for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 28 May 2018 02:29:01 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 31ABA818BAF2 for ; Mon, 28 May 2018 06:29:00 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 28 May 2018 14:28:54 +0800 From: Peter Xu Message-ID: <20180528062854.GC2584@xz-mi> References: <20180524043952.11245-1-peterx@redhat.com> <20180524043952.11245-4-peterx@redhat.com> <8736yh8mze.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> <20180524084844.GF12122@xz-mi> <87bmd55mo4.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87bmd55mo4.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v7 3/4] monitor: more comments on lock-free fleids/funcs List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Markus Armbruster Cc: =?utf-8?Q?Marc-Andr=C3=A9?= Lureau , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Stefan Hajnoczi , "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 01:16:11PM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote: > Peter Xu writes: > > > On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 10:41:09AM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote: > >> Regarding the subject: what are "fleids"? > > > > Ouch. :( I meant the word "fields". > > Can touch that up in my tree. [...] > >> > + /* > >> > + * State used only in the thread "owning" the monitor. > >> > + * If @use_io_thr, this is mon_global.mon_iothread. > >> > + * Else, it's the main thread. > >> > + * These members can be safely accessed without locks. > >> > + */ > >> > ReadLineState *rs; > >> > + // other members that aren't shared > >> > >> Whoops, misunderstanding! I meant this line as a placeholder, to > >> further illustrate my intent. It should not be committed. If we need a > >> comment here, it should use /* traditional comment syntax */. > > > > My fault. > > > > Please let me know if you want me to repost... Thanks, > > Can touch that up, too. No respin needed unless something more complex > comes up. I'll modify these two parts in my next post. Regards, -- Peter Xu