From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40771) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fNfrq-0001H4-G6 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 29 May 2018 10:44:55 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fNfrp-0004Xs-H5 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 29 May 2018 10:44:54 -0400 Date: Tue, 29 May 2018 10:44:46 -0400 From: Jeff Cody Message-ID: <20180529144446.GA31815@localhost.localdomain> References: <20180525163327.23097-1-kwolf@redhat.com> <20180525163327.23097-3-kwolf@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180525163327.23097-3-kwolf@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-block] [PATCH 02/14] vhdx: Fix vhdx_co_create() return value List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Kevin Wolf Cc: qemu-block@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, mreitz@redhat.com On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 06:33:15PM +0200, Kevin Wolf wrote: > .bdrv_co_create() is supposed to return 0 on success, but vhdx could > return a positive value instead. Fix this. > > Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf > --- > block/vhdx.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/block/vhdx.c b/block/vhdx.c > index 0b1e21c750..b1ba121bb6 100644 > --- a/block/vhdx.c > +++ b/block/vhdx.c > @@ -1951,7 +1951,7 @@ static int coroutine_fn vhdx_co_create(BlockdevCreateOptions *opts, > goto delete_and_exit; > } > > - > + ret = 0; > delete_and_exit: > blk_unref(blk); > bdrv_unref(bs); > -- > 2.13.6 > > Reviewed-by: Jeff Cody