From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55388) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fO3T6-0007VQ-OG for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 30 May 2018 11:56:57 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fO3T6-0006px-2X for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 30 May 2018 11:56:56 -0400 From: Kevin Wolf Date: Wed, 30 May 2018 17:56:33 +0200 Message-Id: <20180530155647.14090-4-kwolf@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20180530155647.14090-1-kwolf@redhat.com> References: <20180530155647.14090-1-kwolf@redhat.com> Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 03/17] vhdx: Fix vhdx_co_create() return value List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-block@nongnu.org Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org .bdrv_co_create() is supposed to return 0 on success, but vhdx could return a positive value instead. Fix this. Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf Reviewed-by: Max Reitz Reviewed-by: Jeff Cody --- block/vhdx.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/block/vhdx.c b/block/vhdx.c index 0b1e21c750..b1ba121bb6 100644 --- a/block/vhdx.c +++ b/block/vhdx.c @@ -1951,7 +1951,7 @@ static int coroutine_fn vhdx_co_create(BlockdevCreateOptions *opts, goto delete_and_exit; } - + ret = 0; delete_and_exit: blk_unref(blk); bdrv_unref(bs); -- 2.13.6