From: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>,
pbonzini@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, rth@twiddle.net
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC] hw/pc: set q35 as the default x86 machine
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2018 15:30:46 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180604183046.GR7451@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180604194913-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
On Mon, Jun 04, 2018 at 08:17:23PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 04, 2018 at 10:26:24AM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 04, 2018 at 02:01:29PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jun 04, 2018 at 09:54:15AM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Jun 04, 2018 at 04:38:22AM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > > On Sun, Jun 03, 2018 at 12:27:49PM +0300, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
> > > > > > Moving to QEMU 3.0 seems like a good opportunity for such a change.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I440FX is really old and does not support modern features like IOMMU.
> > > > > > Q35's SATA emulation is faster than pc's IDE, native PCI express hotplug
> > > > > > is cleaner than ACPI based one and so on...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Also the libvirt guys added very good support for the Q35 machine (thanks!).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Management software should always specify the machine type and for the
> > > > > > current setups, adding '-machine pc' to the command line is not such a
> > > > > > big deal.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > In time the pc machine will fade out and we will probably stop adding
> > > > > > new versions at some point.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Marcel Apfelbaum <marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com>
> > > > >
> > > > > For command line users, I think changing the default isn't nice.
> > > > >
> > > > > Yes it's easy to add -machine pc but there's no documentation
> > > > > that tells you to do so. Add to that shortcuts like -cdrom
> > > > > stop working, hotplug needs extra bridges to work, and one
> > > > > can see that while management tool users benefit from q35,
> > > > > command line users will suffer.
> > > > >
> > > > > Can't we add a tag for management without changing the command line
> > > > > default? How about "management-default"? "recommended"? "latest"?
> > > >
> > > > We could add new aliases if they are useful for management
> > > > software, but we would need a well-defined use case and set of
> > > > requirements+expectations for the new alias.
> > >
> > > I'm not convinced by the idea of adding a distinct default "for mgmt". All
> > > the problems described wrt 'q35' vs 'pc' apply equally to management apps
> > > as they do to humans. It just happens that one common mgmt layer (libvirt)
> > > knows how to handle some of the complexity of q35. Other mgmt apps though
> > > are just as likely to be hurt by the change as humans are. So effectively
> > > the proposed "for mgmt" is actually "for libvirt >= some version", which
> > > feels like a layering violation to me.
> >
> > This means the new alias would be used only if requested
> > explicitly by management software (not used automatically by
> > libvirt).
> >
> > Taking that into account, I still don't see what exactly would be
> > the use case here, and what exactly users can/can't expect when
> > using the new alias.
>
> Let's see what we have now first:
>
> 1. We have a requirement for the user to save the machine type on install
> and maintain it with the image (a separate thread discusses saving that
> as part of a qcow2 image).
>
> 2. If you use an alias instead you are supposed to resolve it
> and save the resolved value. If you save the alias instead,
> you can't do cross-version live migration.
>
> 3. If you don't specify anything you get a machine tagged default. You are
> supposed to find it and save the value found. If you don't and just
> keep using the default, you can't do cross-version live migration.
>
> ---
>
> So now we would like to relax 3 to say
> "If you don't and just keep using the default, some images might not
> boot".
>
> unfortunately we probably can't change 3 like this.
> So what I propose instead is simply:
>
> 4. If you find a machine type value tagged "qmp-default" you must save
> the value found. If you don't and just keep using the qmp-default each
> time, then existing guest images won't boot.
> This relaxed compatibility requirement allows for advanced features
> as compared to default.
What problems would this system solve? Who would prefer to use
the "qmp-default" machine-type instead of the "pc" or "q35"
aliases?
--
Eduardo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-06-04 18:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-03 9:27 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC] hw/pc: set q35 as the default x86 machine Marcel Apfelbaum
2018-06-04 1:38 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-06-04 12:24 ` Igor Mammedov
2018-06-04 12:35 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-06-04 18:09 ` John Snow
2018-06-04 12:54 ` Eduardo Habkost
2018-06-04 13:01 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2018-06-04 13:26 ` Eduardo Habkost
2018-06-04 17:17 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-06-04 18:30 ` Eduardo Habkost [this message]
2018-06-04 16:48 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-06-04 16:56 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2018-06-04 18:40 ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2018-06-04 21:08 ` Eduardo Habkost
2018-06-04 18:29 ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2018-06-05 7:27 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2018-06-05 8:43 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2018-06-05 13:06 ` [Qemu-devel] libvirt default machine-type guarantees? (was Re: [PATCH RFC] hw/pc: set q35 as the default x86 machine) Eduardo Habkost
2018-06-05 13:12 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2018-06-05 13:35 ` Eduardo Habkost
2018-06-05 13:41 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2018-06-05 13:44 ` [Qemu-devel] [libvirt] " Pavel Hrdina
2018-06-05 14:03 ` Eduardo Habkost
2018-06-05 14:07 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2018-06-05 14:36 ` Pavel Hrdina
2018-06-05 14:14 ` Pavel Hrdina
2018-06-05 16:16 ` [Qemu-devel] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-06-05 16:22 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2018-06-05 13:20 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC] hw/pc: set q35 as the default x86 machine Marcel Apfelbaum
2018-06-05 13:29 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2018-06-05 13:44 ` Laszlo Ersek
2018-06-05 13:51 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2018-06-05 16:22 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-06-05 15:56 ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2018-06-05 16:01 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2018-06-05 16:20 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-06-05 16:23 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2018-06-05 16:33 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-06-13 18:05 ` Eduardo Habkost
2018-06-14 8:09 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2018-06-15 2:50 ` Eduardo Habkost
2018-06-15 9:03 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2018-06-18 17:14 ` Eduardo Habkost
2018-06-18 17:18 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-06-20 17:28 ` Eduardo Habkost
2018-06-21 7:39 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2018-06-20 17:33 ` Peter Maydell
2018-06-21 7:37 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180604183046.GR7451@localhost.localdomain \
--to=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=rth@twiddle.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).