From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
To: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] CODING_STYLE: Define our preferred form for multiline comments
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2018 09:46:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180605094613.52bcf85d.cohuck@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52a5446f-4624-fd45-ce7d-492269aa5c3f@redhat.com>
On Tue, 5 Jun 2018 06:33:22 +0200
Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 05.06.2018 03:17, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > On Mon, 4 Jun 2018 17:21:40 +0100
> > Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> wrote:
> >
> >> The codebase has a bit of a mix of
> >> /* multiline comments
> >> * like this
> >> */
> >> and
> >> /* multiline comments like this
> >> in the GNU Coding Standards style */
> >>
> >> State a preference for the former.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
> >> ---
> >> I admit that to some extent I'm imposing my aesthetic
> >> preferences here; pretty sure we have a lot more style
> >> 1 comments than style 2, though.
> >> ---
> >> CODING_STYLE | 13 +++++++++++++
> >> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/CODING_STYLE b/CODING_STYLE
> >> index 12ba58ee293..fb1d1f1cd62 100644
> >> --- a/CODING_STYLE
> >> +++ b/CODING_STYLE
> >> @@ -124,6 +124,19 @@ We use traditional C-style /* */ comments and avoid // comments.
> >> Rationale: The // form is valid in C99, so this is purely a matter of
> >> consistency of style. The checkpatch script will warn you about this.
> >>
> >> +Multiline comments blocks should have a row of stars on the left
> >> +and the terminating */ on its own line:
> >> + /* like
> >> + * this
> >> + */
> >> +Putting the initial /* on its own line is accepted, but not required.
> >
> > Could we say "at maintainer discretion", or is that always implied? The
> > asymmetry of the proposed standard is not my favorite and a mostly
> > blank line before and after further supports standing out from
> > surrounding code.
> I also don't like the asymmetry. I'd prefer more dense comments, though:
>
> /* like
> * this */
>
> Anyway, could we either use that dense format or the kernel-style
> multi-lines-comment format, please? Mixing it asymmetrically is just ugly.
I'd vote for the kernel style, then.
I'd also like the bikeshed to be painted in a grayed blue-green.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-06-05 7:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-04 16:21 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] CODING_STYLE: Define our preferred form for multiline comments Peter Maydell
2018-06-04 18:01 ` John Snow
2018-06-04 19:10 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2018-06-05 1:17 ` Alex Williamson
2018-06-05 4:33 ` Thomas Huth
2018-06-05 7:46 ` Cornelia Huck [this message]
2018-06-05 9:19 ` Peter Maydell
2018-06-05 9:49 ` Thomas Huth
2018-06-05 9:55 ` Cornelia Huck
2018-06-07 12:02 ` Markus Armbruster
2018-06-11 11:22 ` Kevin Wolf
2018-06-07 12:40 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2018-06-07 13:25 ` Peter Maydell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180605094613.52bcf85d.cohuck@redhat.com \
--to=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).