From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54908) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fSUjk-0008DR-Gu for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 11 Jun 2018 17:52:29 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fSUjg-0007sA-Kl for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 11 Jun 2018 17:52:28 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:38790) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fSUjg-0007rx-F0 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 11 Jun 2018 17:52:24 -0400 Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2018 18:52:17 -0300 From: Eduardo Habkost Message-ID: <20180611215217.GD7451@localhost.localdomain> References: <20180608205830.308627-1-mst@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180608205830.308627-1-mst@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC untested PATCH] i386/cpu: make -cpu host support monitor/mwait List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Paolo Bonzini , Richard Henderson On Fri, Jun 08, 2018 at 11:59:19PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > When guest CPU PM is enabled, and with -cpu host, expose the host CPU > MWAIT leaf to guest so guest can make good PM decisions. > > Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin > --- > > This builds but is untested. Is this a reasonable way to go about it? Looks good to me. Reviewed-by: Eduardo Habkost -- Eduardo