From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47250) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fSeKS-0005vV-Jp for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 12 Jun 2018 04:07:01 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fSeKR-0003AV-Nu for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 12 Jun 2018 04:07:00 -0400 Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2018 09:06:48 +0100 From: Daniel =?utf-8?B?UC4gQmVycmFuZ8Op?= Message-ID: <20180612080648.GE23739@redhat.com> Reply-To: Daniel =?utf-8?B?UC4gQmVycmFuZ8Op?= References: <20180611205203.2624-1-mreitz@redhat.com> <20180611205203.2624-6-mreitz@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180611205203.2624-6-mreitz@redhat.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 05/10] qapi: Formalize qcow encryption probing List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Max Reitz Cc: qemu-block@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Markus Armbruster , Eric Blake , Michael Roth , Kevin Wolf On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 10:51:58PM +0200, Max Reitz wrote: > qcow only supports a single encryption (and there is no reason why that > would change in the future), so we can make it the default. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Max Reitz > --- > qapi/block-core.json | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrang=C3=A9 Regards, Daniel --=20 |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberran= ge :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.c= om :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberran= ge :|