From: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH] i386: Remove ospke CPUID flag name
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2018 14:16:07 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180613171607.GB7451@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b93cd6e5-bb2e-b932-bc68-da5c314924a2@redhat.com>
On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 07:01:23PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 12/06/2018 20:25, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 05:12:58PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> >> On 12/06/2018 17:01, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Remove OSPKE from the feature name array so users don't try to
> >>>>> configure it manually.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
> >>>> Yes, it's the same as OSXSAVE. Thanks!
> >>> CR4_OSXSAVE_MASK is automatically enabled on user-mode QEMU,
> >>> though.
> >>>
> >>> My question is if it would make any sense to enable CR4_PKE_MASK
> >>> too.
> >>
> >> If you mean OSPKE, then yes---if PKU is available. Likewise, OSXSAVE
> >> should only be enabled if XSAVE is available.
> >
> > Yeah, I mean enabling it only if PKU is available, like we
> > already do with OSXAVE/XSAVE.
> >
> > But we don't do it today, so enabling it automatically in
> > CONFIG_USER_ONLY would be a new feature. Would it be useful for
> > anything, though?
> >
> > I'm asking that to find out if somebody could be already using
> > "-cpu ...,+ospke" with user-mode QEMU today (which this patch
> > would break). If RDPKRU/WRPKRU is useless under user-mode QEMU,
> > than we don't need to worry about that.
>
> Hmm, actually there are two more things to consider for user-mode emulation.
>
> First, QEMU doesn't support any of pkey_mprotect, pkey_alloc, pkey_free,
> so it should probably never set OSPKE.
This means "-cpu ...,+ospke" is useless today and we can safely
remove support for it, right?
> Second, for user-mode emulation it makes sense to allow flipping of
> OSPKE and OSXSAVE, because that corresponds to different behaviors of
> the underlying kernels. There have been bugs in fact with programs that
> incorrectly tested XSAVE instead of OSXSAVE, so it's worthwhile to let
> the user test both configurations.
However, "-cpu ...,-osxsave" has no effect today (user-mode QEMU
unconditionally sets OSXSAVE), so that would be a new feature.
I assume this means I don't need to drop the osxsave patch from
my queue, either.
> So to sum up, the default for QEMU user-mode emulation should be
> OSXSAVE=XSAVE and OSPKE=0.
Thanks!
--
Eduardo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-06-13 17:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-11 20:37 [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH] i386: Remove ospke CPUID flag name Eduardo Habkost
2018-06-11 21:49 ` Richard Henderson
2018-06-12 6:55 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-06-12 15:01 ` Eduardo Habkost
2018-06-12 15:12 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-06-12 18:25 ` Eduardo Habkost
2018-06-13 17:01 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-06-13 17:16 ` Eduardo Habkost [this message]
2018-06-13 17:26 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180613171607.GB7451@localhost.localdomain \
--to=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=rth@twiddle.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).