From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52956) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fTujh-0004ni-CO for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 15 Jun 2018 15:50:18 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fTujc-00007H-GV for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 15 Jun 2018 15:50:17 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:44060) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fTujc-000067-6o for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 15 Jun 2018 15:50:12 -0400 Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2018 15:32:27 -0300 From: Marcelo Tosatti Message-ID: <20180615183224.GA6108@amt.cnet> References: <20180612184616.90838-1-mst@redhat.com> <20180613223449.GA18339@amt.cnet> <20180614022834-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180614022834-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/2] kvm: x86 CPU power management List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Paolo Bonzini , Richard Henderson , Eduardo Habkost , kvm@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 02:37:28AM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 07:34:53PM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 09:47:11PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > This adds ability to expose host CPU power management capabilities to > > > guests. For intel guests, this is sufficient for guest to enable > > > low power CPU power management. For AMD guests it isn't sufficient, > > > deeper C-states are entered using System-IO. > > > > > > mwait based power management is tied closely to specifics of CPUID, > > > making migration challenging. At this point only the non-migrateable > > > -cpu host is supported. > > > > > > With this patch applied, VM latency is within the noise of > > > baremetal for some benchmarks. > > > > > > perf bench sched pipe results: > > > Before: > > > 6.452 sec > > > After: > > > 4.382 sec > > > Baremetal: > > > 4.136 sec > > > > > > Michael S. Tsirkin (2): > > > kvm: support -realtime cpu-pm=on|off > > > i386/cpu: make -cpu host support monitor/mwait > > > > > > include/sysemu/sysemu.h | 1 + > > > target/i386/cpu.h | 9 +++++++++ > > > target/i386/cpu.c | 19 ++++++++++++++----- > > > target/i386/kvm.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > vl.c | 6 ++++++ > > > qemu-options.hx | 9 +++++++-- > > > 6 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > > > > > -- > > > MST > > > > Hi Michael, > > > > 1) Command line option interface > > > > Why is this not an optional cpu feature such as the other features? > > > > > > -cpu CPU,+mwait > > > > rather than a separate, architecture independent "-realtime cpu-pm=on|off" > > command line option? > > Because it's not just a guest flag. With guest pm on, one guest > can severely affect the latency of others on the same host CPU. How so ? > > 2) Migration > > > > Isnt it sufficient to check that both CPUID leafs are the same, > > to allow migration ? > > Not at the moment since linux guests use mwait hints and latency values > from a table in intel_idle. If the host and guest models do not match, > mwait will get a wrong hint. > > It will not do the right thing then! > > You want exactly the same host CPU for it to work. > > This isn't different from how -host cpu works generally. Ok, makes sense. > > 1. Check that the processor supports MONITOR and MWAIT. If > > CPUID.01H:ECX.MONITOR[bit 3] = 1, MONITOR and MWAIT are available at > > ring 0. > > > > 2. Query the smallest and largest line size that MONITOR uses. > > Use CPUID.05H:EAX.smallest[bits 15:0];EBX.largest[bits15:0]. > >