From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56170) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fVQdn-0007GN-Lc for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 19 Jun 2018 20:06:28 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fVQdk-0003LR-GM for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 19 Jun 2018 20:06:27 -0400 Received: from mx3-rdu2.redhat.com ([66.187.233.73]:33384 helo=mx1.redhat.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fVQdk-0003Kq-B1 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 19 Jun 2018 20:06:24 -0400 Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2018 03:06:23 +0300 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Message-ID: <20180620030236-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> References: <20180615222855.44421-1-mst@redhat.com> <20180615222855.44421-2-mst@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 1/2] kvm: support -dedicated cpu-pm=on|off List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Eric Blake Cc: Paolo Bonzini , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Marcelo Tosatti , Eduardo Habkost , kvm@vger.kernel.org, Richard Henderson On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 05:07:46PM -0500, Eric Blake wrote: > On 06/19/2018 10:17 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > On 16/06/2018 00:29, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > +static QemuOptsList qemu_dedicated_opts = { > > > + .name = "dedicated", > > > + .head = QTAILQ_HEAD_INITIALIZER(qemu_dedicated_opts.head), > > > + .desc = { > > > + { > > > + .name = "mem-lock", > > > + .type = QEMU_OPT_BOOL, > > > + }, > > > + { > > > + .name = "cpu-pm", > > > + .type = QEMU_OPT_BOOL, > > > + }, > > > + { /* end of list */ } > > > + }, > > > +}; > > > + > > > > Let the bikeshedding begin! > > > > 1) Should we deprecate -realtime? > > > > 2) Maybe -hostresource? > > What further things might we add in the future? > > -dedicated sounds wrong (it is an adjective, while most of our options are > nouns - thing -machine, -drive, -object, ...) > > -hostresource at least sounds like a noun, but is long to type. But at > least '-hostresource cpu-pm=on' reads reasonably well. Yes but host resource what? I feel it says nothing at all about what one can expect to find in this flag. > About the only other noun I could think of would be '-feature cpu-pm=on'. If we have nothing at all to say about what is grouping these things, we don't need a new flag. We can make it a machine property. It's user's hint that some host resource is dedicated to a VM. > -- > Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer > Red Hat, Inc. +1-919-301-3266 > Virtualization: qemu.org | libvirt.org