From: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>,
Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>,
pkrempa@redhat.com, kraxel@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
qemu-block@nongnu.org, mreitz@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] usb-storage: Add rerror/werror properties
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2018 09:53:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180626085324.GB32319@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <424bb91d-a202-5c3b-1264-254cad0709d0@redhat.com>
On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 10:48:10AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 26/06/2018 10:35, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> > We also want to deprecate usb-storage, but
> > I guess we're still not ready for that (it's a complicated story).
> >
> > To deprecate -drive without also deprecating usb-storage, we need to
> > preserve features.
>
> Patch looks good to me too, but indeed why can't we deprecate
> usb-storage in favor of usb-bot + scsi-disk?
Presumably the migration state of usb-storage is different from the
migration state of usb-bot + scsi-disk, so not a case where libvirt
could silently switch from one to the other. It would need to be an
explicit config change by apps/users.
Regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-06-26 8:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-25 16:42 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] usb-storage: Add rerror/werror properties Kevin Wolf
2018-06-26 8:35 ` Markus Armbruster
2018-06-26 8:48 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-06-26 8:53 ` Daniel P. Berrangé [this message]
2018-06-26 9:14 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-06-26 11:11 ` Gerd Hoffmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180626085324.GB32319@redhat.com \
--to=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=kraxel@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=pkrempa@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).