From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57097) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fYYka-0005yT-NZ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 28 Jun 2018 11:22:25 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fYYkW-0004EG-OR for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 28 Jun 2018 11:22:24 -0400 Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2018 17:22:15 +0200 From: Cornelia Huck Message-ID: <20180628172215.142ed114.cohuck@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20180628113817.30814-1-david@redhat.com> References: <20180628113817.30814-1-david@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1 0/2] s390x/kvm: legacy_s390_alloc() fixes List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: David Hildenbrand Cc: qemu-s390x@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Richard Henderson , Alexander Graf , Christian Borntraeger , Thomas Huth On Thu, 28 Jun 2018 13:38:15 +0200 David Hildenbrand wrote: > Two patches for legacy_s390_alloc(), only relevant under old z/VM versions. Those teddy bears are really looking a bit scruffy... but the patches look sane. > > Patch #1 is relevant when trying to allocate memory for more than one > memory region. Patch #2 is only for completeness, to make it behave > more similar to qemu_anon_ram_alloc(). > > David Hildenbrand (2): > s390x/kvm: legacy_s390_alloc() only supports one allocation > s390x/kvm: indicate alignment in legacy_s390_alloc() > > target/s390x/kvm.c | 15 +++++++++++++-- > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > Thanks, applied.