From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40744) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fYvAJ-0003c2-8w for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 29 Jun 2018 11:18:29 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fYvAF-0003I0-V2 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 29 Jun 2018 11:18:27 -0400 Received: from mx3-rdu2.redhat.com ([66.187.233.73]:47474 helo=mx1.redhat.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fYvAF-0003Gs-Q7 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 29 Jun 2018 11:18:23 -0400 Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2018 17:18:21 +0200 From: Igor Mammedov Message-ID: <20180629171821.5e379a31@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20180629111405.GG27016@redhat.com> References: <153026817452.402489.13386335348113684056.stgit@bahia.lan> <8730183a-3e16-931e-c990-24a5e169b2d9@redhat.com> <20180629103910.GE27016@redhat.com> <65a3597e-5560-1fd3-4f04-8a60e9e99b44@redhat.com> <20180629130701.6ab5d88a@bahia.lan> <29caab50-f853-66bf-805e-984e76619a9a@redhat.com> <20180629111405.GG27016@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] accel: forbid early use of kvm_enabled() and friends List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "Daniel P. =?UTF-8?B?QmVycmFuZ8Op?=" Cc: Paolo Bonzini , Eduardo Habkost , Greg Kurz , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, =?UTF-8?B?Q8OpZHJpYw==?= Le Goater , Richard Henderson , David Gibson On Fri, 29 Jun 2018 12:14:05 +0100 Daniel P. Berrang=C3=A9 wrote: > On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 01:08:38PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > On 29/06/2018 13:07, Greg Kurz wrote: =20 > > >>>> Also asserting current_machine !=3D NULL is not necessary, since y= ou're > > >>>> immediately dereferencing it. =20 > > >>> Is there a practical way to simply initialize the accelerators earl= ier > > >>> in startup sequence, so we just remove or at least reduce, the likl= ihood > > >>> of accessing it too early ? =20 > > >> We can try, though not for 3.0 of course. > > >> =20 > > > FWIW, the motivation for this patch was kvm_enabled() being called un= der > > > the class_init function of the machine TypeInfo. This happens way ear= lier > > > than accelerator init. Not sure this is doable, but I can have a look. > > > =20 > >=20 > > Probably not, that's way too early indeed. =20 >=20 > Yeah, doing anything non-trivial in class_init is just asking for trouble, > as conceivably nothing is initialized at that point.=20 isn't class_init called lazily? (so it might actually work as far as type isn't touched before kvm is initialized) >=20 > Regards, > Daniel