From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37959) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fZsaT-0004NA-LK for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 02 Jul 2018 02:45:26 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fZsaS-0005X0-Te for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 02 Jul 2018 02:45:25 -0400 Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2018 14:45:17 +0800 From: Fam Zheng Message-ID: <20180702064517.GF26002@lemon.usersys.redhat.com> References: <20180629151524.138542-1-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com> <20180629151524.138542-4-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com> <73a74a66-1a16-5cb5-1851-3598c908700b@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <73a74a66-1a16-5cb5-1851-3598c908700b@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 3/3] qemu-iotests: Image fleecing test case 222 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Eric Blake , John Snow Cc: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-block@nongnu.org, kwolf@redhat.com, armbru@redhat.com, mreitz@redhat.com, den@openvz.org On Fri, 06/29 17:04, John Snow wrote: > Mine was indeed inspired by Fam's version, but I opted to rewrite it > instead of continue with the python unit tests approach. This is why I > lost the commit message, existing copyright text, etc. > > I can re-add him as author credit to my version, or at least mention in > the commit message that it was based on a proposed test that he wrote. > > I'm sorry if that was a faux pas. No, especially since you basically rewrote it. Thank you both for mentioning this. :) Fam