From: "Richard W.M. Jones" <rjones@redhat.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, lersek@redhat.com, berrange@redhat.com,
jferlan@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Byte ordering of VM Generation ID in Windows VMs
Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2018 15:11:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180705141132.GM1455@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180705165348-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
On Thu, Jul 05, 2018 at 04:54:16PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 05, 2018 at 01:52:31PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 05, 2018 at 01:39:29PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > > I was doing a bit of investigation around how different hypervisors
> > > handle the VM Generation ID feature. QEMU's behaviour seems quite
> > > strange, I wonder if this is a bug or expected?
> > >
> > > (1) I booted a Windows 2016 VM with:
> > >
> > > qemu-system-x86_64 -M pc,accel=kvm -m 2G -hda w2k16-mincore.img \
> > > -device vmgenid,guid=01020304-0506-0708-090a-0b0c0d0e0f00,id=vmgenid0
> > >
> > > (2) Inside the guest I used the VMGENID.EXE program from:
> > >
> > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1598350#c3
> > > https://docs.microsoft.com/en-gb/windows/desktop/HyperV_v2/virtual-machine-generation-identifier
> > >
> > > Note this is self-compiled using mingw64-g++ (not using Visual Studio
> > > which I don't have available), but I don't believe that could have
> > > caused the problem.
> > >
> > > (3) The program prints:
> > >
> > > VmCounterValue: 708050601020304:f0e0d0c0b0a09
> > >
> > > To make it easier to see, this is the same number but zero-extended:
> > >
> > > VmCounterValue: 07 08 05 06 01 02 03 04 : 00 0f 0e 0d 0c 0b 0a 09
> > > \________ LOW ________/ \_______ HIGH _______/
> > > WORD WORD
> > >
> > > As you can see it looks like there is no clear relationship between
> > > the order of the bytes in the guid= parameter and the order that they
> > > are seen by Windows.
> >
> > OK after examining util/uuid.c and the qemu_uuid_bswap function,
> > I sort of see what's going on here.
> >
> > FWIW other hypervisors seem to store these as two 64 bit integers.
>
> What do others do, and what is, in your opinion, the correct behaviour here?
I don't want to claim any particular behaviour is correct. However ...
VMware represents these internally as two signed 64 bit integers, eg:
vm.genid = "-570734802784577186"
vm.genidx = "-5042519231342505152"
I am still trying to get verification, but I believe the first is the
low 64 bit word and the second is the high 64 bit word.
Hyper-V's implementation is completely opaque, but their documentation
claims that the VM Generation ID is "a 128-bit, cryptographically
random integer value identifier" whatever that means.
As described in the link above, Microsoft provides some example code
for reading the VM Gen ID from a Windows guest. In this code it is
clearly represented as a pair of unsigned 64 bit integers.
Windows >= 2012 R2 provides a device driver which has an API which
also reads a struct containing two unsigned 64 bit ints.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
libguestfs lets you edit virtual machines. Supports shell scripting,
bindings from many languages. http://libguestfs.org
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-05 14:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-07-05 12:39 [Qemu-devel] Byte ordering of VM Generation ID in Windows VMs Richard W.M. Jones
2018-07-05 12:52 ` Richard W.M. Jones
2018-07-05 13:54 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-07-05 14:11 ` Richard W.M. Jones [this message]
2018-07-09 7:36 ` Richard W.M. Jones
2018-07-09 9:05 ` Laszlo Ersek
2018-07-09 9:11 ` Richard W.M. Jones
2018-07-09 15:50 ` Richard W.M. Jones
2018-07-05 14:20 ` Laszlo Ersek
2018-07-05 16:43 ` Richard W.M. Jones
2018-07-05 17:10 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-07-05 20:59 ` Richard W.M. Jones
2018-07-05 17:13 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2018-07-05 17:15 ` Laszlo Ersek
2018-07-05 17:34 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180705141132.GM1455@redhat.com \
--to=rjones@redhat.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=jferlan@redhat.com \
--cc=lersek@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).