qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
To: Balamuruhan S <bala24@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] tests: add precopy multifd migration with fd protocol
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2018 12:37:40 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180706043740.GG23001@xz-mi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180705125230.GC22608@localhost.localdomain>

On Thu, Jul 05, 2018 at 06:22:31PM +0530, Balamuruhan S wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 05, 2018 at 05:26:09PM +0800, Peter Xu wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 05, 2018 at 01:30:17PM +0530, Balamuruhan S wrote:
> > > This patch adds test for multifd migration feature with fd protocol.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Balamuruhan S <bala24@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > > ---
> > >  tests/migration-test.c | 57 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > >  1 file changed, 57 insertions(+)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/tests/migration-test.c b/tests/migration-test.c
> > > index e2434e70ea..29ede3810d 100644
> > > --- a/tests/migration-test.c
> > > +++ b/tests/migration-test.c
> > > @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
> > >   *
> > >   */
> > >  
> > > +#include <unistd.h>
> > >  #include "qemu/osdep.h"
> > >  
> > >  #include "libqtest.h"
> > > @@ -202,6 +203,17 @@ static void read_blocktime(QTestState *who)
> > >      qobject_unref(rsp);
> > >  }
> > >  
> > > +static void getfd(QTestState *who, const char *fdname, int fd)
> > > +{
> > > +    QDict *rsp;
> > > +    gchar *cmd = g_strdup_printf("{ 'execute': 'getfd',"
> > > +                                 "'arguments': { '%s': '%d'} }", fdname, fd);
> > > +    rsp = wait_command(who, cmd);
> > 
> > AFAIU Libvirt passes fds to QEMU via the QMP channel using SCM_RIGHTS.
> > Here we directly specified the fd number. Could you help explain a bit
> > on how it worked?
> 
> Thank you Peter for reviewing the patch.
> 
> so I explored on pipe() system call, that could create channel for inter
> process communication. It gives us 2 fds one for read (I thought
> we can use it for target qemu process) and one for write (we can use it
> for source qemu process). I tried the example snippet from man page so
> I thought we can use it in our migration Qtest.
> 
> Please correct my work if it doesn't make sense.

Yeah the pipe() usage should be fine - though it's the way to pass it
to QEMU that I'm not sure about.

Ok I gave it a shot with your tests on my host and I got this
actually:

  $ QTEST_QEMU_BINARY=./x86_64-softmmu/qemu-system-x86_64 ./tests/migration-test -p /x86_64/migration/multifd/fd
  /x86_64/migration/multifd/fd: **
  ERROR:/home/peterx/git/qemu/tests/migration-test.c:212:getfd: assertion failed: (qdict_haskey(rsp, "return"))
  Aborted (core dumped)
  $ QTEST_QEMU_BINARY=./x86_64-softmmu/qemu-system-x86_64 QTEST_LOG=1 ./tests/migration-test -p /x86_64/migration/multifd/fd
  /x86_64/migration/multifd/fd: [I 1530851360.669526] OPENED
  [R +0.037850] endianness
  [S +0.037870] OK little
  {"QMP": {"version": {"qemu": {"micro": 50, "minor": 12, "major": 2}, "package": "v2.12.0-2164-g20aa87a802"}, "capabilities": []}}{"execute": "qmp_capabilities"}
  
  {"return": {}}[I 1530851360.754972] OPENED
  [R +0.055719] endianness
  [S +0.055737] OK little
  {"QMP": {"version": {"qemu": {"micro": 50, "minor": 12, "major": 2}, "package": "v2.12.0-2164-g20aa87a802"}, "capabilities": []}}{"execute": "qmp_capabilities"}
  
  {"return": {}}{"execute": "getfd", "arguments": {"srcfd": "5"}}
  
  {"error": {"class": "GenericError", "desc": "Parameter 'fdname' is missing"}}**
  ERROR:/home/peterx/git/qemu/tests/migration-test.c:212:getfd: assertion failed: (qdict_haskey(rsp, "return"))
  [I +0.058378] CLOSED
  [I +0.156930] CLOSED
  Aborted (core dumped)

So it seems that the "getfd" command will only take one parameter
"fdname", then the fd should be passed in by UNIX socket magic.  That
should match with what I understand it.  I'm not sure why it worked on
your host.

> 
> > 
> > > +    g_assert(qdict_haskey(rsp, "return"));
> > > +    g_free(cmd);
> > > +    qobject_unref(rsp);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > >  static void wait_for_migration_complete(QTestState *who)
> > >  {
> > >      while (true) {
> > > @@ -619,6 +631,50 @@ static void test_precopy_unix(void)
> > >      g_free(uri);
> > >  }
> > >  
> > > +static void test_multifd_fd(void)
> > > +{
> > > +    int fd[2];
> > > +
> > > +    /* create pipe */
> > > +    if (pipe(fd) == -1)
> > > +        g_test_message("Skipping test: Unable to create pipe");
> > > +        return;
> > > +
> > > +    /* set uri in target with read fd */
> > > +    char *uri = g_strdup_printf("fd:%d", fd[0]);
> > > +    QTestState *from, *to;
> > > +    test_migrate_start(&from, &to, uri, false);
> > > +
> > > +    /* Receive a write file descriptor for source using getfd */
> > > +    getfd(from, "srcfd", fd[1]);
> > > +
> > > +    /* set multifd capability on source and target */
> > > +    migrate_set_capability(from, "x-multifd", "true");
> > > +    migrate_set_capability(to, "x-multifd", "true");
> > > +
> > > +    /* Wait for the first serial output from the source */
> > > +    wait_for_serial("src_serial");
> > > +
> > > +    /* perform migration */
> > > +    migrate(from, uri);
> > 
> > I'm not sure I understand correctly here, but I feel like we should
> > use the fd[1] or anything that was bound to fd[1] on source side to do
> > the migration rather than fd[0]?  Please feel free to correct me..
> > 
> 
> fd[0] - read channel so we should use it for target (-incoming fd:fd[0])
> fd[1] - write channel so we shouls use it for source to transfer/write
> and for it we need to assign using `getfd` monitor command on source.

Yeah again the logic should be fine, though we might need to implement
the SCM_RIGHTS magic here, like what we did in, e.g.,
qio_channel_socket_writev() in QEMU.

Regards,

-- 
Peter Xu

  reply	other threads:[~2018-07-06  4:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-07-05  8:00 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] tests: multifd migration test scenarios Balamuruhan S
2018-07-05  8:00 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] tests: add precopy multifd migration test with unix Balamuruhan S
2018-07-05  9:19   ` Peter Xu
2018-07-05  8:00 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] tests: add precopy multifd migration with fd protocol Balamuruhan S
2018-07-05  9:26   ` Peter Xu
2018-07-05 12:52     ` Balamuruhan S
2018-07-06  4:37       ` Peter Xu [this message]
2018-07-06  5:51         ` Balamuruhan S
2018-07-05  8:06 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] tests: multifd migration test scenarios no-reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180706043740.GG23001@xz-mi \
    --to=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=bala24@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).