From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53438) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fchrW-0000b0-Cz for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 09 Jul 2018 21:54:43 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fchrT-0007jC-CS for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 09 Jul 2018 21:54:42 -0400 Received: from mx3-rdu2.redhat.com ([66.187.233.73]:41186 helo=mx1.redhat.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fchrT-0007j1-86 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 09 Jul 2018 21:54:39 -0400 Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2018 04:54:35 +0300 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Message-ID: <20180710045101-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> References: <20180629221907.3662-1-venu.busireddy@oracle.com> <20180702161404.GA2339@rkaganb.sw.ru> <449f1449-ddf6-cd95-976c-14d04d8d503a@oracle.com> <20180703095825.GC30904@rkaganb.sw.ru> <20180709130035.GA6271@rkaganb.sw.ru> <9136094e-a510-4201-7c71-d1c49226fa5f@oracle.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <9136094e-a510-4201-7c71-d1c49226fa5f@oracle.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 0/3] Use of unique identifier for pairing virtio and passthrough devices... List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: si-wei liu Cc: Roman Kagan , Venu Busireddy , Marcel Apfelbaum , virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, sridhar.samudrala@intel.com, alexander.h.duyck@intel.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jul 09, 2018 at 06:11:53PM -0700, si-wei liu wrote: > The plan is to enable group ID based matching in the first place rather than > match by MAC, the latter of which is fragile and problematic. It isn't all that fragile - hyperv used same for a while, so if someone posts working patches with QEMU support but before this grouping stuff, I'll happily apply them. > I have made > the Linux side changes and will get it posted once the QEMU discussion for > grouping is finalized. Go ahead but at this point I think we need to see actual QEMU support at least for the basic functionality before we merge more code Linux-side. -- MST