From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60588) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1feySe-0004au-CF for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 16 Jul 2018 04:02:25 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1feySZ-0002Nl-OS for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 16 Jul 2018 04:02:23 -0400 Received: from mx3-rdu2.redhat.com ([66.187.233.73]:52048 helo=mx1.redhat.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1feySZ-0002NR-K0 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 16 Jul 2018 04:02:19 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1789E7DAC6 for ; Mon, 16 Jul 2018 08:02:19 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2018 10:02:13 +0200 From: Cornelia Huck Message-ID: <20180716100213.25c44c16.cohuck@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20180716073226.21127-1-armbru@redhat.com> <20180716073226.21127-3-armbru@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] MAINTAINERS: New section "Incompatible changes", copy libvir-list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Thomas Huth Cc: Markus Armbruster , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, libvir-list@redhat.com, pkrempa@redhat.com, berrange@redhat.com On Mon, 16 Jul 2018 09:54:12 +0200 Thomas Huth wrote: > On 16.07.2018 09:32, Markus Armbruster wrote: > > Libvirt developers would like to be copied on patches to qemu-doc > > appendix "Deprecated features". Do them the favor. > > > > Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster > > --- > > MAINTAINERS | 4 ++++ > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS > > index 20eef3cb61..666e936812 100644 > > --- a/MAINTAINERS > > +++ b/MAINTAINERS > > @@ -2194,6 +2194,10 @@ M: Daniel P. Berrange > > S: Odd Fixes > > F: docs/devel/build-system.txt > > > > +Incompatible changes > > +R: libvir-list@redhat.com > > +F: qemu-deprecated.texi > > Should we have a maintainer for the file, too? (I guess not, because > deprecation patches should go through the specific subsystems...) I don't think adding a maintainer makes sense for this file. > And what about a "S:" line? I don't think that makes too much sense, either. If anything, qemu-deprecated.texi should be in a category 'maintained by everybody', i.e. qemu-devel. Just like qemu-doc.texi, which does not have an entry in MAINTAINERS at all.