From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58051) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ffcF9-0001NQ-PH for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 17 Jul 2018 22:31:09 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ffcF6-0008Ew-JZ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 17 Jul 2018 22:31:07 -0400 Received: from ozlabs.org ([203.11.71.1]:53255) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ffcF5-00089r-O3 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 17 Jul 2018 22:31:04 -0400 Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2018 12:30:53 +1000 From: David Gibson Message-ID: <20180718023053.GD2102@umbus.fritz.box> References: <20180716025346.GF2599@umbus.fritz.box> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="d9ADC0YsG2v16Js0" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] hw/display/sm501* status List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Maydell Cc: BALATON Zoltan , Magnus Damm , Aurelien Jarno , Gerd Hoffmann , Sebastian Bauer , QEMU Developers --d9ADC0YsG2v16Js0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 09:43:05PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 16 July 2018 at 21:26, BALATON Zoltan wrote: > > I could list sm501 in the sam460ex section thus formally taking > > sub-maintainership but this would only go as far that I'll get cc-d on > > changes and try to review them. I still can't (and don't want to) maint= ain > > my own tree and send pull requests directly so I'd need someone's help = with > > that who can take my patches and merge them via their tree. If it's OK = to > > continue to use the PPC tree for that I'm fine with that if David agrees > > (which I think he did above). > > > > So is it OK to add sm501 to sam460ex section so I claim responsibility = for > > changes and will continue sending patches cc-ing David (and maybe Gerd = to > > help spotting problems) then David could take these via the PPC tree? >=20 > I think that makes sense. sh4 is pretty dead and if sm501's major > active user is the sam460ex then listing it there seems reasonable. Sounds good to me. Zoltan, can you send a patch adding sm501 to the sam460ex section of the MAINTAINERS file. That will make you the right point of contact for it. On the understanding that it's just about tree logistics, rather than review, I'll be happy to take sm501 patches from you through my tree. --=20 David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_ | _way_ _around_! http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson --d9ADC0YsG2v16Js0 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEdfRlhq5hpmzETofcbDjKyiDZs5IFAltOpl0ACgkQbDjKyiDZ s5I+Uw//TFjZIWgl05g0MAm5nqXyc9EmHeGm1Hrlk3avZL4ILPFufV2aN72RniNx z9e5P+Hd2z7YcSlIpUjLFfzvuAOUOpaMAw/74oUe39Q+AvvtzGNttvoYxBclPHpj BJY7dZB96/csUhpq6GNYainfhDrJ5HZJN+NpVd1SrTO22uMdRccv1EB4Zi3Deykl 7n8fXAiOXyoRUHTY2EX2ytuU/tPrqQz0pLlCOZevt3L4U+2DKZf+Y3fNjFUYTUIY FYBE69dzkw2Om8gmK8l65ORkXfF+LO63eOTperQdxgNZLdfiZGcdmLJnRA9s7olr 5aXkitiXWF4MlnVOg+qrMuDN/hr8ObSjIySNU1+QEUR8XrGV/fXIoOGWd7fsMqxh keKzVW/gRz0CSVoFVLss3Z3hTox0vOTnOIXdcZhfz3bP5rljqf1bedX+frtrLoou rrBd7EfzM0aFK+MS5TztirFGi0yRzJUKSDKzd6yz6ogQnxTH0C6KQstWNPw8+HK2 lo3unn0RJ5AAC2eebjqkiNe8uwVDAca6GFhHbsrBvm+DU3ZMU7bYlwAjAF8AZNa2 V48q8U1ltfHmfw/a85GRrrW+Hr9SrSC718B5cOSqmPOI53ZVpVASUnNK1cuupQXs xGXCn0O0bEcZgIr6+cMeX6gS7zjddY0ysoyYRUTPPg5BI9jUjcE= =3faF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --d9ADC0YsG2v16Js0--