From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60991) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fg7fi-0008Ak-2c for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 19 Jul 2018 08:04:42 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fg7fc-00006z-AV for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 19 Jul 2018 08:04:38 -0400 Received: from mx3-rdu2.redhat.com ([66.187.233.73]:42422 helo=mx1.redhat.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fg7fb-000067-VR for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 19 Jul 2018 08:04:32 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 78033401EF02 for ; Thu, 19 Jul 2018 12:04:31 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2018 14:04:26 +0200 From: Cornelia Huck Message-ID: <20180719140426.4a472767.cohuck@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <5f6e1882-93ff-717b-5a00-24b36c7df432@redhat.com> References: <20180717120414.5852-1-quintela@redhat.com> <87601dztj3.fsf@secure.mitica> <2767a97a-006d-46cd-ce16-7cfedc93ef29@redhat.com> <20180719134522.5de53f8f.cohuck@redhat.com> <5f6e1882-93ff-717b-5a00-24b36c7df432@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC 00/14] More patches to disable stuff List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Thomas Huth Cc: quintela@redhat.com, lvivier@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, peterx@redhat.com, dgilbert@redhat.com On Thu, 19 Jul 2018 13:58:02 +0200 Thomas Huth wrote: > On 19.07.2018 13:45, Cornelia Huck wrote: > > On Thu, 19 Jul 2018 13:06:59 +0200 > > Thomas Huth wrote: > >> I agree with you that the current situation with virtio-pci. c is bad. I > >> think we should split it up into individual files instead > >> (virtio-pci-rng.c etc.). > > > > We should then do the same thing for virtio-ccw as well. > > Yes. I can do that if you like. Sure, feel free to go ahead.