From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45304) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fgb9E-0002FB-3b for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 20 Jul 2018 15:33:05 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fgb9A-0006dA-6o for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 20 Jul 2018 15:33:04 -0400 Received: from mail-pl0-x243.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c01::243]:36663) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fgb9A-0006ci-0H for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 20 Jul 2018 15:33:00 -0400 Received: by mail-pl0-x243.google.com with SMTP id e11-v6so5592415plb.3 for ; Fri, 20 Jul 2018 12:32:59 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2018 12:32:57 -0700 From: Nishanth Aravamudan Message-ID: <20180720193257.GB23996@breakout> References: <20180718211256.29774-1-naravamudan@digitalocean.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] block/file-posix: add bdrv_attach_aio_context callback for host dev and cdrom List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Farhan Ali Cc: Eric Blake , Kevin Wolf , John Snow , Max Reitz , Stefan Hajnoczi , Fam Zheng , Paolo Bonzini , qemu-block@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 20.07.2018 [15:11:14 -0400], Farhan Ali wrote: > I am seeing another issue pop up, in a different test. Even though it's a > different assertion, it might be related based on the call trace. Just to be clear, this does not happen if you revert the original patch (i.e., the one you bisected to before)? I'm digging into the code now. -Nish