From: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
To: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
Marcel Apfelbaum <marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com>,
Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong.eric@gmail.com>,
Ben Warren <ben@skyportsystems.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-3.1 2/2] acpi: Decouple ACPI hotplug callbacks from HotplugHandler
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2018 09:39:16 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180724123916.GC3896@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180724142949.3078da82@redhat.com>
On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 02:29:49PM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Jul 2018 16:31:45 -0300
> Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > The ACPI hotplug callbacks get a HotplugHandler object as
> > argument. This has two problems:
> >
> > 1) The functions require a TYPE_ACPI_DEVICE_IF object, but the
> > function prototype doesn't indicate that. It's possible to
> > pass an object that would make the function crash.
> > 2) The function does not require the object to implement
> > TYPE_HOTPLUG_HANDLER at all, but the function prototype
> > imposes that for no reason.
> >
> > Change the argument type to AcpiDeviceIf instead of
> > HotplugHandler.
> What is the motivation for this patch,
> do you actually get crashes?
I didn't get crashes, but the idea for the change came when
Michael asked me how to get the HotplugHandler object. I was
going to suggest current_machine (which is also a hotplug
handler), when I noticed he actually needed an AcpiDeviceIf
object.
The main motivation, however, is to simply make the function
prototypes make sense. Is there a single reason to make the ACPI
functions get a HotplugHandler argument instead of AcpiDeviceIf?
--
Eduardo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-24 12:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-07-23 19:31 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-3.1 0/2] ACPI type safety cleanup Eduardo Habkost
2018-07-23 19:31 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-3.1 1/2] acpi: Improve acpi_send_event() type safety Eduardo Habkost
2018-07-24 12:27 ` Igor Mammedov
2018-07-23 19:31 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-3.1 2/2] acpi: Decouple ACPI hotplug callbacks from HotplugHandler Eduardo Habkost
2018-07-24 12:29 ` Igor Mammedov
2018-07-24 12:39 ` Eduardo Habkost [this message]
2018-07-24 15:28 ` Igor Mammedov
2018-07-24 15:48 ` Eduardo Habkost
2018-07-24 18:14 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-07-25 6:57 ` Igor Mammedov
2018-07-25 13:46 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180724123916.GC3896@localhost.localdomain \
--to=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=ben@skyportsystems.com \
--cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=xiaoguangrong.eric@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).