From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42270) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fifia-0004AP-Ir for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 26 Jul 2018 08:50:11 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fifiX-0000zM-Kb for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 26 Jul 2018 08:50:08 -0400 Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2018 13:49:52 +0100 From: Daniel =?utf-8?B?UC4gQmVycmFuZ8Op?= Message-ID: <20180726124952.GI22369@redhat.com> Reply-To: Daniel =?utf-8?B?UC4gQmVycmFuZ8Op?= References: <1532496652-26364-2-git-send-email-hongbo.zhang@linaro.org> <20180725095426.f7kv4ftngeje6pkx@kamzik.brq.redhat.com> <20180725114404.6g335n3rfjt23hjc@kamzik.brq.redhat.com> <20180726104636.aua3pjsqkqnkvggk@kamzik.brq.redhat.com> <20180726111354.flyqh2yo4xm5z6m7@kamzik.brq.redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 2/2] hw/arm: Add Arm Enterprise machine type List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Laszlo Ersek Cc: Andrew Jones , Ard Biesheuvel , Peter Maydell , Radoslaw Biernacki , Hongbo Zhang , QEMU Developers , Leif Lindholm , qemu-arm , Alex =?utf-8?Q?Benn=C3=A9e?= On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 02:23:46PM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > On 07/26/18 13:13, Andrew Jones wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 12:56:22PM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > >> On 26 July 2018 at 12:52, Peter Maydell wrote: > >>> On 26 July 2018 at 11:46, Andrew Jones wrote: > >>>> i440fx and q35 are specific machine types. 'sbsa' is a generic machine > >>>> type that conforms to the SBSA specification. If you weren't trying to > >>>> memory map AHCI and EHCI controllers, or if memory mapped AHCI and EHCI > >>>> controllers were mandated in the SBSA spec, then there wouldn't be > >>>> anything to discuss. But that's not the case. You're attempting to > >>>> hard code one instance of a generic class of SBSA machines, but then > >>>> just call it 'sbsa'. > >>> > >>> Modelling a 'generic SBSA machine' is not the goal here (I'm > >>> not sure that's even possible or useful), so let's just > >>> stipulate that we'll call the machine type something else > >>> and move on ? > >>> > >> > >> Fine with me. Care to suggest a name? :-) > >> > > > > Also fine by me, but I'm not going to suggest the name. I fear the > > backlash I'd receive after this mail thread! > > > > I suggest "showcase2018". (Dead serious.) Further suggestions "refplatform" "sbsareference" "sbsademo" "phys" (physical counterpart to "virt") Regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|