From: Niels de Vos <ndevos@redhat.com>
To: Jeff Cody <jcody@redhat.com>
Cc: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>,
qemu-block@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
Prasanna Kumar Kalever <prasanna.kalever@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3] block/gluster: Handle changed glfs_ftruncate signature
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2018 11:18:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180731091802.GL17519@ndevos-x270> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180730192729.GA443110@localhost.localdomain>
On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 03:27:29PM -0400, Jeff Cody wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 10:07:27AM -0500, Eric Blake wrote:
> > On 07/28/2018 02:50 AM, Niels de Vos wrote:
> > >>
> > >>Part of me wishes that libgfapi had just created a new function
> > >>'glfs_ftruncate2', so that existing users don't need to handle the api
> > >>change. But I guess in the grand scheme, not a huge deal either way.
> > >
> > >Gluster uses versioned symbols, so older binaries will keep working with
> > >new libraries. It is (hopefully) rare that existing symbols get updated.
> > >We try to send patches for these kind of changes to the projects we know
> > >well in advance, reducing the number of surprises.
> >
> > >>I can go ahead and add that to the comment in my branch after applying, if
> > >>Niels can let me know what that version is/will be (if known).
> > >
> > >The new glfs_ftruncate() will be part of glusterfs-5 (planned for
> > >October). We're changing the numbering scheme, it was expected to come
> > >in glusterfs-4.2, but that is a version that never will be released.
> > >
> >
> > Wait - so you're saying gluster has not yet released the incompatible
> > change? Now would be the right time to get rid of the API breakage, before
> > you bake it in, rather than relying solely on the versioned symbols to avoid
> > an ABI breakage but forcing all clients to compensate to the API breakage.
> >
>
> If this is not yet in a released version of Gluster, I'm not real eager to
> pollute the QEMU driver codebase with #ifdef's, especially if there is a
> possibility the API change may not actually materialize.
>
> Is there any reason that this change is being approached in a way that
> breaks API usage, and is it too late in the Gluster development pipeline to
> change that?
There recently have been a few changes like this in libgfapi. These have
been introduced to improve performance in common use-cases where an
updated 'struct stat' is needed after an operation. Some functions have
been adapted in previous releases, glfs_ftruncate() landed too late for
that. I hope we'll get a complete coherent API with glusterfs-5 again.
For QEMU this means additional changes will come related to
glfs_fallocate(), glfs_zerofill() and probably more. The current
glusterfs-4.1 version will be maintained for one year, after which the
detection/#ifdef can be removed as the than maintained versions should
all have the updated API. I'm sorry for the inconvenience that this
causes.
If you prefer, I can wait with sending patches for QEMU with future
Gluster releases until additional changes have landed in libgfapi.
Thanks,
Niels
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-31 9:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-07-27 8:19 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3] block/gluster: Handle changed glfs_ftruncate signature Niels de Vos
2018-07-27 13:21 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 for-3.0] " Eric Blake
2018-07-27 13:24 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3] " Eric Blake
2018-07-28 4:18 ` Jeff Cody
2018-07-28 7:50 ` Niels de Vos
2018-07-30 15:07 ` Eric Blake
2018-07-30 19:27 ` Jeff Cody
2018-07-31 9:18 ` Niels de Vos [this message]
2018-07-31 19:51 ` Jeff Cody
2018-08-01 11:47 ` Niels de Vos
2018-08-01 15:17 ` Eric Blake
2018-07-30 21:24 ` Jeff Cody
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180731091802.GL17519@ndevos-x270 \
--to=ndevos@redhat.com \
--cc=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=jcody@redhat.com \
--cc=prasanna.kalever@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).